Wazzup Pilipinas!?
In the heart of Milan, two skyscrapers rise not just as monuments of glass and steel, but as living, breathing ecosystems. Known as Bosco Verticale—the Vertical Forest—these towers are covered with thousands of trees and plants, housing not only people but also birds, insects, and pollinators. They have become an emblem of what is possible when architecture and nature are no longer adversaries but collaborators.
But here lies the question that reverberates beyond Europe: Can such a nature-centric housing model be built in the Philippines? And if so, where, when, and how?
At a time when the Philippines faces a dual crisis—an ever-worsening housing backlog of more than 6.5 million homes and escalating biodiversity loss due to unrestrained urbanization—the answer could very well redefine the future of Filipino cities.
The Case for Nature-Centric Housing
The traditional model of housing expansion—cutting down forests, reclaiming wetlands, bulldozing mangroves—has left communities more vulnerable to floods, heatwaves, and water shortages. Every hectare lost weakens the ecosystems that sustain food, clean air, and disaster resilience.
Milan’s Vertical Forest flipped this logic: instead of banishing nature to distant reserves, it integrated greenery into the very core of urban living. Studies show residents benefit from lower temperatures, improved air quality, reduced noise pollution, and even better mental health. Wildlife flourishes in vertical gardens, transforming towers into sanctuaries for both humans and non-humans.
For the Philippines, ranked as one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots and also among the most climate-vulnerable nations, the model is not just aspirational—it is urgent.
Feasibility in the Philippine Context
To adapt such a system locally, three realities must be addressed:
Geography and Climate
The Philippines’ tropical climate supports a wide variety of plant species, many of which thrive vertically. Native flora like katmon, banaba, narra, bamboo, and ornamental ferns can be used instead of imported plants.
Vertical forests could double as flood buffers and urban cooling systems in sweltering cities like Metro Manila, Cebu, and Davao.
Housing Demand
Government projections require building millions of homes by 2030. Instead of massive sprawl into farmlands and forests, eco-towers could provide high-density, low-footprint housing in urban centers.
Socioeconomic Equity
While vertical forests abroad often cater to the wealthy, a Philippine model must be inclusive. Mixed-income developments with government subsidy and private investment can prevent gentrification and widen access.
A Step-by-Step Plan for the Philippines
1. Pilot Projects (2026–2030)
Where: Start in Metro Manila (Quezon City, Pasig, Taguig) where housing demand is highest, heat stress is severe, and green space is minimal. Cebu and Davao could follow as regional pilots.
Scale: 2–3 towers per city, each housing 500–800 families.
Design: Partner with Filipino architects, landscape designers, and ecologists to ensure plant selection is native and resilient.
2. Partnerships & Collaborations
Government:
Department of Human Settlements and Urban Development (DHSUD) for housing integration.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) for biodiversity compliance.
Local governments for land zoning and infrastructure support.
Private Sector:
Ayala Land, SMDC, Megaworld, and Robinsons Land for real estate development.
Renewable energy companies to power buildings sustainably.
Academia & NGOs:
University of the Philippines (UP) College of Architecture and College of Forestry for research.
Haribon Foundation and WWF-Philippines for biodiversity alignment.
3. Funding Sources
Public-Private Partnerships (PPP): Developers build with tax incentives for eco-design.
Green Bonds: Issue climate-resilient housing bonds to attract investors.
International Grants: Tap into the Green Climate Fund, UN-Habitat, and World Bank climate financing.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Philippine conglomerates can co-finance as part of ESG commitments.
4. Expansion Phase (2031–2040)
Roll out eco-housing projects in other fast-urbanizing provinces: Bulacan (linked to New Manila International Airport), Cavite, Iloilo, and Cagayan de Oro.
Integrate vertical forests into government-backed socialized housing projects.
Why It’s Not Just About Buildings
This is not only about constructing towers draped in greenery—it is about a shift in national mindset. Filipinos must stop viewing nature as a disposable backdrop to urban development. Instead, trees, rivers, wetlands, and even mangroves must be treated as partners in survival.
The Philippines has long suffered from the consequences of seeing housing and nature as separate: choking traffic, floods from denuded watersheds, deadly heatwaves in cement-heavy cities. Vertical forests and nature-centric housing represent not just architectural innovation but a new covenant with the land.
Conclusion: Building Homes, Saving Nature
If Milan can transform its skyline into a forest, why not Manila, Cebu, or Davao?
Yes, it will cost more initially. Yes, it will demand political will, creative financing, and cultural change. But the long-term payoffs—resilient cities, healthier citizens, preserved biodiversity—are priceless.
The housing crisis cannot be solved by bricks and mortar alone. It demands a reimagining of what it means to live well: homes that do not destroy nature, but live in harmony with it.
The Philippines now stands at a crossroads. Will it continue the cycle of urban sprawl and environmental collapse, or will it dare to build forests in the sky and communities that breathe with the Earth?
The answer will shape not just skylines, but futures.
Ross is known as the Pambansang Blogger ng Pilipinas - An Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Professional by profession and a Social Media Evangelist by heart.
.jpg)
Post a Comment