Wazzup Pilipinas!?
In a decision that reverberated across the nation, the Supreme Court of the Philippines in 2021 ruled that former President Rodrigo Duterte could not escape accountability before the International Criminal Court (ICC) despite his unilateral withdrawal from the Rome Statute. The ruling dealt a major blow to Duterte's attempts to shield himself from the global tribunal’s probe into the thousands of killings linked to his brutal war on drugs—an anti-narcotics campaign that has left a trail of blood and controversy since 2016.
A Shocking Verdict That Shattered Duterte’s Legal Defense
Duterte’s administration had long argued that since the Philippines had officially withdrawn from the ICC in 2019, the court no longer had jurisdiction over alleged crimes committed on Philippine soil. The Supreme Court, however, struck down this argument, making it clear that a country’s withdrawal from the Rome Statute does not extinguish the ICC’s authority over crimes committed before the exit took effect.
The ruling established a precedent: international accountability is not something that a head of state can simply opt out of. Duterte, who had often dismissed the ICC as a foreign institution with no power over him, suddenly found himself standing on shakier ground. The court’s decision reinforced that justice—especially for the thousands of victims of extrajudicial killings—cannot be erased by mere political maneuvering.
The War on Drugs: A Humanitarian Crisis
Duterte’s war on drugs was one of the most controversial policies in modern Philippine history. From the moment he took office in 2016, he unleashed a relentless campaign against alleged drug users and pushers, urging law enforcement to take an iron-fisted approach.
Police operations and vigilante-style killings became the norm. Families were shattered as loved ones were gunned down in dark alleys, homes, and even in front of their children. Reports from human rights organizations estimated that between 6,000 to 30,000 individuals were killed, many of them under suspicious circumstances, with law enforcement repeatedly justifying the deaths as cases of “nanlaban” (resisting arrest).
Despite repeated calls for transparency and justice, the Duterte administration doubled down, rejecting criticism from both local and international watchdogs. The government insisted that the drug war was necessary to rid the country of criminal elements, even as mass graves, grieving families, and chilling testimonies painted a different picture.
The ICC Investigation: A Moment of Reckoning
The Supreme Court’s ruling removed a major roadblock for the ICC’s prosecutor, who had been pushing for a formal investigation into Duterte’s possible crimes against humanity. The decision signaled that the Philippines, despite Duterte’s rhetoric, was still bound by its prior commitments to the international legal system.
The ruling’s impact was immediate. With this legal shield stripped away, the ICC gained stronger footing to proceed with its probe. Duterte and his allies were left scrambling, calling the court’s decision a betrayal and claiming that the ICC had no right to intervene in domestic affairs.
Despite their protests, international justice mechanisms remained firm. The ruling sent a message to the world: no leader, regardless of power or influence, is beyond the reach of justice.
The Fight for Justice Continues
For the families of drug war victims, the Supreme Court’s decision was a beacon of hope. For years, they had suffered in silence, watching as investigations were dismissed, evidence was ignored, and officials denied their loved ones justice. Now, with the Supreme Court affirming that Duterte could be held accountable, their fight gained renewed strength.
However, challenges remain. Political allies, legal maneuvers, and the complexities of international law could still delay or complicate the ICC’s work. Duterte himself has repeatedly vowed to resist any attempts to bring him before the court, warning that he would rather be “shot dead” than arrested.
A Defining Moment for Philippine Democracy
The Supreme Court’s 2021 ruling will be remembered as a watershed moment in Philippine legal history. It was a declaration that even the most powerful figures cannot simply walk away from justice.
More than just a legal decision, the ruling was a test of the country’s commitment to the rule of law. Would the Philippines stand by its constitutional principles, or would it allow impunity to prevail? The world continues to watch, waiting to see if justice for the victims of the drug war will finally be served.
As the ICC moves forward, one thing is certain—history will not forget the blood that has been spilled. And for those seeking justice, the fight is far from over.
Ross is known as the Pambansang Blogger ng Pilipinas - An Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Professional by profession and a Social Media Evangelist by heart.
.jpg)
