Wazzup Pilipinas!?
The 2025 elections are fast approaching, and as always, the party-list race is heating up. Based on the latest OCTA Research survey conducted from March 18 to 24, 2025, the top contenders in the party-list system have been revealed. Topping the list are:
ACT-CIS – 8.70% (3 seats)
Tingog – 5.77% (3 seats)
4Ps – 5.40% (3 seats)
Ako Bicol – 4.20% (3 seats)
Senior Citizen – 3.70% (2 seats)
GP (Galing sa Puso) – 3.14% (2 seats)
Duterte Youth – 2.87% (2 seats)
TUPAD – 2.36% (2 seats)
Malasakit@Bayanihan – 2.33% (2 seats)
Ang Probinsyano – 2.12% (2 seats)
FPJ Panday Bayanihan – 2.03% (2 seats)
On the surface, these numbers reflect the people's choice — but are they really?
Party-lists: For the Marginalized or for the Mighty?
The 1987 Constitution envisioned the party-list system as a means to give a voice to marginalized sectors of society — the fisherfolk, the farmers, the indigenous peoples, the urban poor. But somewhere along the way, the spirit of this noble intention has been hijacked.
Let’s break down the backgrounds and personalities behind each of the Top 11 Party-lists featured in the recent 2025 OCTA survey, and take a closer look at whether they genuinely represent the marginalized sectors, or if they are extensions of political dynasties, business interests, or power plays:
1. ACT-CIS (8.70%) – 3 Seats
Background: Associated with the Tulfo family, specifically Erwin and Raffy Tulfo. Also backed by Rep. Eric Yap, a former ally of then-President Duterte.
ACT-CIS, consistently leading in surveys and actual elections, is backed by the powerful Tulfo brothers, media personalities-turned-political juggernauts. Alongside them is Jocelyn Tulfo, wife of Raffy Tulfo and sister-in-law of Erwin. Another known affiliate is Congressman Eric Yap, tied to another prominent political name. Is this a representation of the underprivileged — or a consolidation of media influence and political clout?
Controversy: Known for riding on their massive media presence and connections to national figures.
Question: Are they true champions of the marginalized, or simply using media clout to stay in power?
2. TINGOG (5.77%) – 3 Seats
Background: Strongly affiliated with the Romualdez family, particularly House Speaker Martin Romualdez, a cousin of President Bongbong Marcos.
Even Tingog, rising fast in the rankings, is closely linked to the Romualdez family, relatives of President Bongbong Marcos and a long-standing political powerhouse in Leyte.
Controversy: Critics argue it serves as a political vehicle for the family rather than Eastern Visayas’ underrepresented.
Question: Tingog means "voice" — but whose voice are they really amplifying?
3. 4PS (5.40%) – 3 Seats
Background: Named after the government’s Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps), it is reportedly supported by the Abalos dynasty from Mandaluyong.
4Ps, supposedly named after the government's Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program for the poor, is associated with the Abalos dynasty — a family already wielding considerable power in national and local politics. If you're wondering how a social welfare initiative was turned into a political campaign, you're not alone.
Controversy: Accused of using the 4Ps name to gain votes by misleading poor families into thinking it is part of the government aid program.
Question: Are they helping the poor or exploiting their dependency?
4. AKO BICOL (4.20%) – 3 Seats
Background: Tied to powerful business groups in the Bicol Region and the Co family.
Controversy: Critics say it’s a regional party-list serving elite interests under the guise of regional advocacy.
Question: Is it truly grassroots Bicolano representation or just regional branding for the rich?
5. SENIOR CITIZEN (3.70%) – 2 Seats
Background: Purports to represent elderly citizens. Had representation issues in the past and internal disputes.
Controversy: Historically, this party-list was disqualified and reinstated due to internal wrangling and alleged manipulation of senior citizens' support.
Question: Are they actively protecting seniors' welfare or merely capitalizing on a vulnerable demographic?
6. GP (GALING SA PUSO) (3.14%) – 2 Seats
Background: Linked to former Manila Mayor Isko Moreno and other local political figures.
Controversy: Critics say its messaging is vague and rooted in emotional branding more than tangible sectoral advocacy.
Question: Is this from the heart — or just a soft slogan masking old politics?
7. DUTERTE YOUTH (2.87%) – 2 Seats
Background: Headed by Ronald Cardema, staunch Duterte supporter, and known for extreme pro-government stances.
Duterte Youth is another eyebrow-raiser. Its name alone capitalizes on the legacy of the former President Rodrigo Duterte, and its leader, Ronald Cardema, has been marred by controversy — from age eligibility issues to accusations of Red-tagging.
Controversy: Disqualified in 2019 due to Cardema's age and accusations of Red-tagging, militarism, and fascism.
Question: Does it serve the youth or echo authoritarian ideologies?
8. TUPAD (2.36%) – 2 Seats
Background: Its name resembles the government’s emergency employment program (Tulong Panghanapbuhay sa Ating Disadvantaged/Displaced Workers), often mistaken as a government initiative.
Controversy: Potentially misleading to voters who associate it with DOLE’s TUPAD.
Question: Is it a party-list or a ploy to confuse?
9. MALASAKIT@BAYANIHAN (2.33%) – 2 Seats
Background: Connected with the Malasakit Centers launched during Senator Bong Go’s term. Likely affiliated with Duterte-allied politicians.
Controversy: "Malasakit" branding has been criticized as a tool for perpetuating patronage politics.
Question: Is it institutionalized charity, or institutionalized campaigning?
10. ANG PROBINSYANO (2.12%) – 2 Seats
Background: Tied to political figures with a strong media angle, including possible links to the FPJ legacy and provincial actors.
Controversy: Questions persist about how much they really advocate for provincial development vs. using the brand's emotional appeal.
Question: A defender of the provinces or just another actor in the political drama?
11. FPJ PANDAY BAYANIHAN (2.03%) – 2 Seats
Background: Banking on the late Fernando Poe Jr.'s legacy. Often associated with supporters or relatives of FPJ.
Controversy: Riding the nostalgia of a beloved national figure, but lacking in clear marginalized representation.
Question: Is this cultural hero worship turned into political maneuvering?
Final Thoughts
What do these facts tell us?
Instead of representing the laborer, the fisherfolk, the teacher, the indigenous, or the urban poor, many of today’s top party-lists appear to be:
Fronts for traditional political dynasties
Branding plays using government programs or celebrity names
Vehicles for well-funded campaigns and national influence
The party-list system was never meant to be a playground for powerful families and personalities. It was meant to level the playing field. But now, it’s largely become another avenue for political recycling and dynasty expansion.
Let us not forget: Representation is not a right reserved for the rich and famous. It is a sacred duty for those who truly know the struggles of the marginalized.
Vote not for the loudest voice or the flashiest brand — but for the truest cause.
Only then can we reclaim democracy’s promise.
A System Under Siege
When billionaires, political dynasties, and celebrity-backed candidates dominate the party-list race, what chance does a genuine marginalized group have? Indigenous peoples’ groups, farmers’ alliances, labor unions, and transport cooperatives often lack the money, machinery, and media mileage to compete.
And yet the Constitution never intended for this system to be a backdoor for traditional politicians. Sadly, the party-list system has now become a fallback for dynasties that cannot run under district seats — a “Plan B” for those desperate to hold power.
Wake Up, Pilipinas!
This is a clarion call to all voters: BEWARE! Don’t be dazzled by familiar names, catchy slogans, or empty promises. Ask the hard questions: Who are they really representing? What laws have they authored that uplift the truly marginalized? Are they grassroots in essence, or simply grassroots in disguise?
The 2025 party-list preference survey is not just a list — it is a reflection of how distorted our democracy has become.
We need to fight to bring back the true spirit of the party-list system: representation for the underrepresented, a voice for the voiceless, power for the powerless.
As the founder of Wazzup Pilipinas, I urge the electorate: Dig deeper. Question boldly. Vote wisely. Because in the end, the marginalized don’t need more opportunists — they need champions.
Let’s not allow this system to be their playground any longer.
This exposé is a civic call from the Wazzup Pilipinas founder, Ross Flores Del Rosario. Follow us for more fearless, factual, and fair content.