Sara Duterte’s Evolving Stance on the EDSA People Power Revolution: A Tale of Contradictions?

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

The political landscape of the Philippines has always been shaped by its leaders’ views on historical events, and one of the most defining moments in the country’s history is the EDSA People Power Revolution of 1986. This event, which led to the ousting of dictator Ferdinand Marcos, remains a deeply polarizing topic, with some hailing it as a victory for democracy while others question its legacy.

A recent comparison of statements from Sara Duterte, the current Vice President and Education Secretary, and formerly the Mayor of Davao City, reveals an apparent shift in her perspective on EDSA. In 2017, she expressed skepticism and resistance toward its significance. By 2024, however, she publicly embraced the revolution’s ideals. The question now is: Has Sara Duterte truly changed her stance, or is this a calculated political move?

Sara Duterte in 2017: A Harsh Critique of EDSA

In a statement dated February 24, 2017, while serving as Davao City Mayor, Sara Duterte voiced a strong disdain for the way EDSA is regarded as the benchmark of freedom in the Philippines.

“I find it hard to understand why this bloodless revolution has become the standard definition of freedom for our country and this standard is forced down our throats by a certain group of individuals who think they are better than everyone else.”

Her words reflect a deep frustration, possibly echoing the sentiments of her father, former President Rodrigo Duterte, who was also critical of the revolution. Many Duterte supporters have long questioned whether EDSA truly benefited the nation or merely replaced one elite with another.

Sara Duterte’s 2017 remarks align with the populist rhetoric that fueled the rise of the Duterte brand—one that challenged the established narratives upheld by those in power before her father’s presidency. By questioning EDSA’s legacy, she positioned herself as a leader willing to break away from mainstream historical interpretations.

Sara Duterte in 2024: A Newfound Appreciation for EDSA?

Fast forward to February 25, 2024, and Sara Duterte, now the country’s Vice President and Education Secretary, presented a very different message on EDSA:

“Let us remember the lessons of Edsa—the power of unity, the strength of the Filipino spirit, and the importance of standing up for what is right. [...] May we continue to uphold the spirit of Edsa in all that we do.”

The stark contrast in tone raises several important questions. Has Sara Duterte genuinely changed her perspective, or is this a strategic political recalibration?

As Vice President and Education Secretary, she holds a significant national leadership role, requiring her to adopt a more unifying stance. Acknowledging the importance of EDSA aligns with the broader historical education expected from someone in her position. It also signals a possible attempt to appeal to a wider audience, particularly those who see EDSA as a defining moment in Philippine democracy.

This shift also coincides with the current administration’s alliance with the Marcos family, whose patriarch was the very dictator overthrown by the revolution. By framing EDSA in a more neutral or positive light, Sara Duterte may be strategically balancing her allegiance to both the Marcoses and the pro-EDSA sectors of society.

The Bigger Picture: A Politician’s Evolution or Political Strategy?

Sara Duterte’s apparent change in stance is not an isolated incident in Philippine politics. Many leaders have adapted their positions over time, often in response to shifting political landscapes.

Political Pragmatism: As a potential future presidential candidate, Sara Duterte must appeal to a broader electorate beyond her father’s core base. Acknowledging EDSA’s significance could be an effort to soften her image and gain support from moderates.

Institutional Role: As Education Secretary, she is responsible for shaping historical education, making it difficult to outright dismiss a pivotal national event. Her new position demands a more balanced perspective.

Marcos-Duterte Alliance: The Bongbong Marcos administration benefits from Duterte’s popularity, and vice versa. By tempering her criticism of EDSA, Sara Duterte avoids unnecessary political friction while maintaining good relations with both Marcos loyalists and pro-democracy advocates.

Final Thoughts: Words vs. Actions

While Sara Duterte’s evolving stance on EDSA is notable, what truly matters is whether her leadership reflects the revolution’s democratic ideals. Will she champion transparency, good governance, and the rule of law? Or is this simply a tactical shift in rhetoric to align with the current political climate?

As the nation watches her next moves, Filipinos must remain vigilant and critical. Political statements can change, but the real test lies in actions, policies, and governance.

One thing remains certain: Sara Duterte’s political journey is far from over, and her evolving stance on EDSA is just one chapter in a much larger narrative.

Duterte Betrayed the Nation? Guanzon Blames Father and Daughter for PH Chaos!

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

​In a recent statement, former Commission on Elections (Comelec) Commissioner Rowena Guanzon attributed the current turmoil in the Philippines to the actions of the Duterte family, particularly former President Rodrigo Duterte and Vice President Sara Duterte. Guanzon criticized Rodrigo Duterte's decision to allow the burial of the late dictator Ferdinand Marcos Sr. at the Libingan ng mga Bayani, suggesting that this act emboldened the Marcos family to regain political power. She also accused Sara Duterte of facilitating Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr.'s return to a prominent political position by aligning with him during the elections.​

"Kasalanan din talaga ng mga Duterte kaya nagkanda leche leche ang bansang ito

Kasalanan ni digong na ipinalibing pa ang Marcos Sr. sa libingan ng mga bayani kaya lumakas ang loob ng mga yan, anyare ngayon?

Kasalanan din ni Sara na nagpagamit at makakuha ng maraming boto si BBM para makabalik ang mga yan sa puwesto

Kung si leni ang nanalo baka di tayo ganito kagulo

Puputak kayo sa confidential funds eh totoo naman pero ang sabi ko nga dapat lahat tanggalan na ng confidential funds pati sana intelligence fund dahil wala naman silang mga utak at puro nakaw lang ang ginawa

Kaya walang ibang sisihin kundi kayo din na mga nagpabudol na mag Amang Duterte at mga DDS, aminin niyo na tama kami nabudol kayo at nadamay pa kami lahat

Ang mga Marcos at Romualdez ay traydor, balikan niyo ang kasaysayan." - Rowena Guanzon

The Controversial Burial of Marcos Sr.

In 2016, President Rodrigo Duterte authorized the interment of Ferdinand Marcos Sr. at the Libingan ng mga Bayani, a move that sparked widespread protests and debates. Critics argued that honoring a leader accused of human rights violations and corruption during Martial Law was a step toward historical revisionism. Despite opposition, the Supreme Court permitted the burial, leading to nationwide demonstrations and a renewed discourse on the Marcos legacy. ​

Political Alliances and Their Implications

The political alliance between Sara Duterte and Bongbong Marcos during the elections played a significant role in reshaping the country's leadership landscape. This partnership, often referred to as the "UniTeam," combined the influence of two powerful political families, leading to a landslide victory. However, this alliance has since deteriorated, resulting in public disputes and political instability. The once-unified front now faces challenges that have significant implications for governance and policy-making.​

Confidential Funds and Governance Concerns

Guanzon also addressed the issue of confidential and intelligence funds, criticizing their allocation and potential misuse. She advocated for the removal of such funds across all government agencies, questioning their necessity and transparency. This stance comes amid ongoing investigations into the alleged misappropriation of public funds by high-ranking officials, including Vice President Sara Duterte. These investigations have led to legal actions, including impeachment proceedings and criminal complaints, further intensifying the political discord. ​

Historical Context and Current Implications

The resurgence of the Marcos family in Philippine politics has reignited discussions about historical accountability and the collective memory of Martial Law atrocities. Guanzon's remarks underscore the importance of revisiting historical narratives to understand the present political climate. The interplay between the Duterte and Marcos families continues to shape the nation's trajectory, prompting citizens and leaders alike to reflect on the lessons of the past to navigate current challenges.​

Chiz Escudero’s VP Ambitions? David D’Angelo Warns Against ‘Impeachment Bargain’!

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

​In the midst of the political turbulence surrounding Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment proceedings, Bunyog Pagkakaisa senatorial candidate David D'Angelo has issued a pointed admonition to Senate President Francis "Chiz" Escudero. D'Angelo cautioned Escudero against leveraging the Senate's role in the impeachment trial as a strategic maneuver to ascend to the vice presidency.​

During an interview with Radyo Pilipinas, D'Angelo expressed his concerns:​

"Once Vice President Sara is impeached, the position of the vice president will be vacant, and the President can appoint whoever he likes to be the vice president... I hope [Escudero] doesn't use this as a bargaining process to be named the next vice president." ​

In response to such speculations, Senate President Escudero has been unequivocal. He emphasized that, according to the Constitution, the President must nominate a replacement from either the Senate or the House of Representatives in the event of a vice-presidential vacancy. Escudero stated he has no interest in assuming the vice presidency and would decline the role if offered. ​

Escudero further clarified the constitutional process:​

"According to the Constitution, if the vice president is impeached, the president will choose a replacement from Congress. The Senate president does not automatically assume the position." ​

The impeachment trial of Vice President Duterte is slated to commence after the 20th Congress convenes in July 2025. Escudero has projected that the Senate, acting as an impeachment court, could conclude the trial and render a verdict by October 2025. ​

Amid these developments, Escudero has urged members of the House of Representatives who initiated the impeachment to demonstrate transparency and integrity. He called on them to make a public commitment, similar to his own, to dispel any suspicions of ulterior motives. ​

As the nation anticipates the forthcoming impeachment trial, the political landscape remains charged with debates over constitutional processes and the ethical responsibilities of public officials. The discourse between D'Angelo and Escudero underscores the critical importance of adhering to democratic principles and ensuring that personal ambitions do not overshadow the pursuit of justice and good governance.​

For a deeper insight into David D'Angelo's perspectives on the issues surrounding the Duterte family, you can watch his recent interview.

Here is the link to the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiJ2YChSHy4