BREAKING

Monday, October 14, 2024

PHLPost Davao City opens first ever Drive-Thru Postal Service in the country


Wazzup Pilipinas!?


Postmaster General Luis D. Carlos of the Philippine Postal Corporation (PHLPost) opened on October 11 its first Drive-Thru Post Office in Davao City, which is also the first in the country. 

Davao City Central Post Office is situated in the heart of the city, where traffic congestion and limited parking have been ongoing challenges.

Postmaster General Carlos said that they support Davao City’s broader efforts to enhance urban mobility and ensure smoother traffic operations in busy areas. 

He added, “This represents a forward-thinking approach for postal service delivery, offering a more accessible and client-friendly solution while maintaining compliance with traffic regulations”.

The Drive-Thru service is an Innovative post office experience and modern approach to traditional postal services, enhancing the overall client experience in sending or receiving domestic or international registered and express mails in one quick stop.

The idea of establishing a drive-thru post office at the Davao City Central Post Office was inspired in compliance with the City Ordinance No. 0334-12, Series of 2012, also known as the Comprehensive Transport & Traffic Code of Davao City which focuses on regulating traffic flow in high-density areas.

The Davao City Drive-Thru Post Office is set to transform how people conduct postal transactions, offering a more accessible and time-efficient option for the convenience of the mailing public.

“The project is in line with the city’s goal to improve vehicular flow and alleviate traffic around the post office by minimizing the time vehicles spend in one location”, Eastern Mindanao Postal Area Director Rose Tubal said.

PHLPost will provide a designated area where postal patrons can briefly park their vehicles to efficiently complete their transactions. The said service ensures that the clients' needs are met while it contributes to the city's transportation and traffic management goals.

The drive-thru service ensures quick transactions, limited to five to eight minutes, reducing waiting time. The motoring public can also phone-in their transaction before going to the Post Office to pick up their parcels at its hotline Tel. No. 224-2961.




Ode to Duterte: A Director’s Lens by Darryl Yap – A Perspective on a Polarizing Leader


Wazzup Pilipinas!?


"Ode to Duterte: A Director’s Lens by Darryl Yap 

Duterte is a game-changer. A plot twist in the nation’s history that no one saw coming. He didn’t just walk onto the political stage—he tore down the backdrop and rewrote the script. He doesn’t bow to anyone, least of all the United States, no matter how many times they tried to co-direct. And while the neoliberal elite sneer at his brashness, pretending their polished lines are the only dialogue worth hearing, he gave the masses their own voice, raw and unfiltered. 

As a filmmaker, I’ve felt the weight of rejection—exiled from the safe comfort of art circles that reward predictability and pander to the status quo. Artists, most of them, can’t stand Duterte. To them, he’s the villain who refuses to follow their storyboard of propriety and progressive ideals. But I’ve always embraced the chaos. I’ve never been afraid of shaking the frame, tilting the narrative, and letting the ugly truths play out. So, when it came to Duterte, I stood my ground, fully knowing that my support would attract more enemies.

WALA AKONG PAKIALAM. In this industry, where applause is often conditional—where endorsing him could mean being blacklisted—I didn’t flinch. The critics with their curated outrage, they thrive in the age of Duterte-hating, awarded like festival darlings for their clever disdain. But I knew their real fear: it wasn’t just Duterte. It was the possibility of another Duterte emerging, someone unmanageable, unscripted, untethered to the old ways. As a director, I understand the importance of antagonists. They force the hero to evolve, disrupt the arc, and push the story forward. Duterte was no saint, but he disrupted a stagnant narrative. Where others saw vulgarity, I saw something closer to truth—something you can’t cut or edit to make palatable. 

What they fear most isn't just Duterte himself—it’s the legacy he leaves behind. A legacy that makes them uneasy. Because in their carefully staged productions, they want predictability. They want the kind of character who asks permission before flipping the table. Duterte flipped it, burned it, and dared everyone to rebuild it from scratch. And maybe that’s what drew me to him. Like me, he never played it safe. We both understand that art—real, honest art—doesn't aim to please. It disturbs, provokes, and challenges the way you see the world. 

Now, as I continue to love the father and daughter of Davao—while also loving Imee—my faith in PRRD remains intact. Duterte made sure FEM was laid to rest with the honor he was denied for years— Ito at marami pang dahilan kung bakit nananatiling nasa tabi ni Inday si Manang. 

Yet now, Bongbong—his own son and namesake—seems more focused on burying his legacy than preserving it. It was Duterte who secured FEM’s dignified burial. Ironically, it’s Bongbong who appears to be burying not just his father, but the memory of everything he stood for. Ipinalibing ni Duterte si Marcos Sr. Pilit inililibing ni Jr. si Duterte, pero hindi mangyayari."



Rodrigo Duterte has been one of the most controversial figures in Philippine politics, a president who shattered the conventions of governance and communication, blazing his own path through the rigid corridors of power. In "Ode to Duterte: A Director’s Lens," filmmaker Darryl Yap offers a provocative reflection on Duterte, capturing both the boldness of his leadership and the friction it created within the elite circles of society and art.


A Disruptor in the Political Scene

To Darryl Yap, Duterte represents a radical shift in the nation's political landscape, a leader who not only rejected tradition but actively deconstructed it. He didn't just emerge as a politician, Yap asserts—he rewrote the entire narrative, creating a new kind of leader who dismissed decorum, disdained foreign interference, and gave voice to the masses. For Yap, Duterte is not merely a man who led; he is a force of nature who unapologetically represented a more primal, unrefined reality.

The political establishment, with its rehearsed speeches and polished rhetoric, viewed Duterte’s brashness with disdain. The director likens Duterte to a plot twist, an unexpected change in the story arc of the Philippines. The president’s unfiltered, often vulgar, language resonated with the common Filipino but repelled the liberal elite. While others clung to tradition, Duterte was busy breaking the mold, and Yap—an artist who thrives in chaos—embraced him for it.


An Artist's Rebellion Against Conformity

Darryl Yap’s view of Duterte mirrors his own experience in the art world. As a filmmaker, Yap has faced criticism for going against the grain of mainstream artistic trends, choosing instead to create work that challenges, disturbs, and disrupts the norm. In this sense, Duterte became the political embodiment of Yap’s artistic philosophy.

For Yap, many artists rejected Duterte because he represented the antithesis of the progressiveness they championed. To these artists, Duterte was a villain, a figure who refused to follow the rules of propriety and civility. Yet Yap, undeterred by the threat of backlash, chose to stand by Duterte. In his words, “Wala akong pakialam” (I don’t care). This attitude, one of defiance against the mainstream, encapsulates both his support for Duterte and his own approach to filmmaking. Yap is unafraid of polarizing views, welcoming the hate and opposition he knew would come with endorsing such a divisive leader.

In a landscape where critics thrive on anti-Duterte sentiments, Yap finds the genuine fear isn’t Duterte himself but the idea that another Duterte—a disruptor, a rebel—might rise again. This possibility threatens the established systems that the elite wish to preserve, and Yap sees this fear as a key element of the ongoing political tension in the country.


Duterte as the Antagonist of Tradition

Duterte’s presidency, much like an antagonist in a film, forced the nation to confront uncomfortable truths and evolve. Yap views antagonists as necessary for driving narratives forward—without them, there’s no change, no growth. Duterte was no hero, Yap concedes, but he disrupted the stagnant political story that had long governed the Philippines.

Where the political elite saw vulgarity, Yap saw truth. Duterte’s raw, unrefined approach to leadership may have been unsettling, but it was closer to reality than the airbrushed narratives typically spun by politicians. Duterte didn’t just flip the table—he burned it down and dared the country to rebuild it. This radical approach resonates with Yap, who as a filmmaker rejects the idea that art should be predictable or palatable. Like Duterte’s presidency, Yap’s art aims to disturb, provoke, and force viewers to reevaluate their perspectives.


A Complicated Legacy

The final part of Yap’s ode is a lament over the perceived burying of Duterte’s legacy, not by the public, but by Ferdinand Marcos Jr. (Bongbong). Yap acknowledges Duterte’s role in securing a dignified burial for the late Ferdinand Marcos Sr., an act that symbolized Duterte’s alignment with the strongman legacy. Yet, ironically, Yap sees Bongbong as someone who is now burying Duterte’s memory, distancing himself from the populist wave that carried him to power.

This paradox—Duterte honoring Marcos Sr., and Marcos Jr. seemingly burying Duterte—reflects the ongoing struggle over political narratives in the Philippines. Yap’s unwavering faith in Duterte and his belief that the president’s legacy will endure is the core of his argument. For Yap, Duterte’s impact cannot be erased, no matter how much the current administration tries to distance itself from his controversial reign.


Conclusion: An Ode to Defiance

In "Ode to Duterte: A Director’s Lens," Darryl Yap positions himself as both an artist and a political observer who thrives on the tension between order and chaos. Duterte, for him, is not just a former president—he is a symbol of rebellion, a political artist who disrupted the national narrative with raw authenticity. As much as Duterte’s critics deride his leadership, Yap sees in him a kindred spirit: a fellow disrupter, unafraid to challenge the status quo, unafraid to create something new from the ashes of the old.

Yap’s tribute to Duterte is more than just praise for a political figure—it’s a manifesto for those who embrace change, for those who refuse to play by the rules of the establishment. Through his director’s lens, Yap immortalizes Duterte as a complex antagonist whose legacy will continue to provoke, challenge, and shape the country long after his exit from the political stage.

The Danger of Truth and Ignorance: Understanding Two Critical Concepts


Wazzup Pilipinas!?



In the midst of the rapid changes in our society, two critical ideas come to mind that remind us of how ideologies like fascism can take root and why truth often becomes the target of hatred.

These ideas are:

"The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it."

"When asked how fascism starts, they first entice the ignorant, then silence the wise."


Truth and Hatred: A Cycle of Sacrifice

The first idea speaks of the relationship between truth and hatred, a powerful cycle that engulfs societies that stray from reason. I’ve seen this firsthand in the way people react to uncomfortable truths. When a society chooses to accept lies or false beliefs rather than confront the truth, those who stand for honesty often become targets of persecution.

There’s a fear in facing the truth, especially when it has the potential to disrupt illusions built by those in power. I recall instances where, upon challenging certain norms or exposing corruption through my platform, the reaction was not just indifference but outright hostility. I realized this anger wasn’t directed at me personally—it was aimed at the truth itself.

In many countries, leaders use disinformation to distract people from real issues like corruption, unemployment, or inequality. I've witnessed how those who expose these truths—whether whistleblowers, journalists, or activists—are often vilified. In such a climate, it’s not just their words that are attacked; they face harassment, threats, and in extreme cases, violence. The anger toward them stems from a deep fear of change, a reluctance to confront the truth.


The Rise of Fascism: Ignorance and the Silencing of Intelligence

The second idea illustrates how fascism takes hold. It starts with the manipulation of the ignorant and the silencing of the wise. I’ve seen echoes of this in various political landscapes, where those in power appeal to the uninformed masses, promising easy solutions to complex problems. When people are deprived of critical thinking, they become easier to control.

I’ve watched how those who question or challenge these simplistic ideas are often dismissed or silenced. Whether it’s through censorship, defamation, or the monopolization of media, the voices of reason are gradually drowned out. It becomes easier for fascism to take root when no one dares to oppose or present more nuanced perspectives.

Fascism thrives on control—control of thoughts, ideas, and dissent. The ignorant become tools in the hands of authoritarian leaders, while the wise, who could offer meaningful opposition, are silenced. I’ve often wondered what happens when rational thinkers give in to fear or indifference, choosing silence over resistance. It creates a dangerous void where manipulation and deceit can flourish unchecked.


A Reminder for the Present

These two ideas feel more relevant than ever as the world continues to face the challenges of disinformation, the rise of authoritarian regimes, and the suppression of free thought. I’ve had my share of moments where speaking the truth felt like standing against a tide of indifference or hostility. But it’s crucial to remember that if we allow truth to be silenced, we risk allowing lies to dominate our societies.

As I reflect on these concepts, I’m reminded that our responsibility is not just to speak the truth but to actively fight against the forces that seek to silence those who do. Ignorance and fear are the breeding grounds of fascism. By encouraging open dialogue and critical thinking, we can help prevent these dangerous ideologies from taking root.

In these times, we must ask ourselves:

How do we prevent fascism?

Why is truth so often hated?

The answer lies in our collective willingness to stand up for the truth, no matter how uncomfortable it may be, and to resist the ignorance that threatens to lead us down a darker path.



How can truth win?

Why silence intelligence?

Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas Wazzup Pilipinas and the Umalohokans. Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas celebrating 10th year of online presence
 
Copyright © 2013 Wazzup Pilipinas News and Events
Design by FBTemplates | BTT