The Long Road to Climate Action: A History of International Policy

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

The journey of international climate policy is a complex saga of scientific consensus, political pressure, and evolving agreements. From the initial recognition of climate change to the latest global stocktake, the path has been anything but smooth. This article delves into the key milestones and dramatic shifts that have defined the global response to this existential crisis.

The Genesis: From Science to Policy

The story begins in the 1970s and 80s, when the scientific community firmly established that global warming and climate change were anthropogenic, meaning caused by human activity. This scientific consensus created a mounting call for environmental, political, and social justice. The concept of climate as a global commons—a resource or area that is shared by all of humanity—took hold, and the political pressure for a unified response intensified.

This pressure culminated in 1992 at the Rio Earth Summit, where three major climate and environment conventions were framed. This event was a watershed moment, setting the stage for the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and mandating the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) to provide scientific guidance.

The UNFCCC: Laying the Groundwork

Established in 1992, the UNFCCC is the foundational international environmental treaty for addressing climate change. It doesn't set binding emission targets itself but instead serves as a framework of systems, institutions, and processes (like the annual Conference of Parties or COP). Its core objective is to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations at a level that would prevent "dangerous" human interference with the climate system.

A cornerstone of the UNFCCC is the principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR-RC). This principle acknowledges that all countries share a common duty to act, but historically large emitters, primarily developed nations, have a greater responsibility and capacity to lead and provide financial and technological support to developing countries.

The Kyoto Protocol: A First Attempt at Binding Targets

Adopted in 1997, the Kyoto Protocol was the first legally binding international treaty to set emission reduction targets. It operated on a top-down structure with mandated targets for developed countries (known as Annex I parties). The protocol's key achievement was demonstrating that international cooperation on climate change was possible. It also established vital infrastructure like emissions trading and the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), which created a carbon market.

However, the protocol's legacy is marked by significant controversy and shortcomings. The US, the world's largest emitter at the time, never ratified the treaty, severely undermining its global impact. Canada later withdrew, and concerns over carbon leakage (where production simply moved to non-regulated countries) and integrity issues with the CDM surfaced. Ultimately, even if fully implemented, the targeted reductions were scientifically insufficient to meaningfully alter the path of climate change. It was a crucial first step, but a very small one.

The Copenhagen Accord: A Dramatic Failure

COP15 in 2009 was meant to be a turning point—an arena to negotiate a successor to the Kyoto Protocol. Instead, it became a dramatic failure. The Copenhagen Accord, a weak, non-binding political statement, was brokered by a handful of major economies behind closed doors, excluding many other countries and even civil society. The conference was widely declared a failure for not producing a legally binding treaty.

The accord did recognize the goal of limiting temperature rise to 2°C and called for developed countries to provide $100 billion per year in climate finance to developing nations. However, it was only "noted" by the conference, not adopted, and had no legal force.

The Paris Agreement: A New Era of Collaboration

The Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015, marked a new chapter. It is a landmark international treaty with a core aim to limit global warming to well below 2°C, preferably to 1.5°C, compared to pre-industrial levels. Unlike its predecessor, it introduced a new era of Universal Participation with commitments from both developed and developing countries, moving away from the rigid Annex classification.

The key mechanism of the Paris Agreement is Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Instead of top-down targets, each country submits its own national climate action plan. These NDCs are meant to be "ratcheted" upwards through periodic updates every five years, ensuring continuous improvement.

The agreement also established the Global Stocktake (GST), a process for countries to collectively assess progress toward the agreement's goals. The first GST, concluded at COP28 in 2023, set the stage for more ambitious NDCs up to 2035.

COP28's Global Stocktake: A Beginning to the End of Fossil Fuels?

The first Global Stocktake in Dubai in 2023 was a pivotal moment. The most historic outcome was the first-ever global agreement to transition away from fossil fuels. The GST decision calls on countries to contribute to global efforts on two major fronts:

Energy Transition: 

This includes calls to transition away from fossil fuels in energy systems, triple global renewable energy capacity by 2030, and accelerate zero- and low-emission technologies.

Climate Finance: 

The stocktake recognized the need for significantly increased financial support for developing nations. The operationalization of the Loss and Damage Fund, with initial pledges of ~$700 million, was a major win for vulnerable countries, though the amount is seen as insufficient.

From the first cautious steps of the UNFCCC to the ambitious, albeit fragile, framework of the Paris Agreement, the international community has grappled with the monumental challenge of climate change. The journey has been filled with political drama and hard-won progress, highlighting the complexities of collective action on a global scale.  The path ahead remains uncertain, but the agreements forged over these decades provide a crucial blueprint for the world's most critical fight.

Navigating the Triple Planetary Crisis: Insights from the UN's Role in Climate Action and Global Health

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

The United Nations Climate Change Conference (UNFCCC) is the global platform for climate action, with its primary aim to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations to a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Since its establishment in 1992, the UNFCCC has produced pivotal agreements like the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, which commit state parties to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and address climate change mitigation, adaptation, and finance. The annual Conference of the Parties (COP) is where these agreements are negotiated and implemented. The presentation covered the key outcomes of COP29, highlighting the pledges made to various funds and setting new collective quantified goals for climate finance. A central theme of these discussions is the interconnectedness of climate change with other global crises, a concept known as the triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution.

UN Institutions & Inter-Governmental Decision Making

The UN, founded in 1945 by the UN Charter, is the backbone of global peace and security. It operates through six main bodies: the General Assembly (UNGA), Security Council (UNSC), Secretariat, International Court of Justice (ICJ), Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), and the Trusteeship Council. The UN also includes 15 specialized agencies, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which function autonomously.

With 193 sovereign member states, the UNGA provides a platform for equal representation and voting rights. Major milestones in its history include the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1946), the Earth Summit (1992), and the establishment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Decision-making within this complex framework relies on debate, negotiation, and often, consensus.

Climate and Health at COPs

The intersection of climate change and global health has become a critical focus at recent COPs. COP26 saw more than 80 countries committing to climate-resilient and low-carbon health systems, along with the launch of the Alliance for Transformative Action on Climate Change and Health (ATACH), hosted by the WHO. COP27 further elevated this by providing high-level financing for ATACH and establishing a Global Youth Forum on Health and Climate Change. This momentum continued at COP28, which featured the first-ever climate and health ministerial meeting and led to the COP28 Declaration on Climate and Health, endorsed by 148 countries.

COP29: Outcomes and Expectations

The presentation spotlighted COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, which hosted 67,000 delegates. The key expectation for COP29 was a "Climate Finance COP" result, aiming for a New Collective Quantified Goal for Climate Finance to enable greater ambition. This included building on the Global Stocktake (NDCs) from COP28 to enhance collective ambition. The Baku Climate Unity Pack emerged as a key outcome, with pledges for UNFCCC-related funds, including a goal of raising $1.3 trillion by 2035. Negotiations on the Global Stocktake (NDCs) will continue in 2025.

Funding the United Nations

A key question addressed in the presentation was who funds the UN. The presentation revealed that the United States is the largest single contributor, followed by Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom.  This bar graph illustrates the stark contrast between the contributions of a few major economies and the rest of the world, highlighting the financial dynamics that underpin global governance.

National Interests, Global Outcomes: The Role of Countries and Regions

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

From the silence of a single vote, a world's collective voice can either be born or be blocked. The UNFCCC's consensus-based system is a high-stakes arena where one voice can halt progress, but no single voice can dictate it. This is the stage for a drama of diplomacy, where nations form "Negotiating Groups," not out of convenience, but out of necessity. These aren't just alliances; they are intricate webs of political and institutional alignment, designed to pool resources, share information, and, most critically, consolidate political clout. They are the power brokers of climate action, speaking with a common voice to command attention on a global stage.

These groups are forged from shared location, circumstance, or a common issue. Consider the Group of Landlocked Developing Countries, like Bhutan and Nepal, their very geography binding them in a shared struggle. Or the Least Developed Countries, such as Cambodia and Bangladesh, united by their acute vulnerability. The Like-Minded Developing Countries—India, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and the Philippines—represent a formidable bloc of nations grappling with both development and climate change.

The plot thickens with the larger, more powerful alliances. The G77 + China is a behemoth, a coalition of developing nations that includes India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mongolia, Nepal, Pakistan, and the Philippines. This alliance, in its sheer size and diversity, holds immense sway. Then there's the BASIC Group, a powerful subset composed of Brazil, South Africa, India, and China, whose collective weight in global emissions and emerging economies makes them central to any climate negotiation. The Coalition for Rainforest Nations—Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Indonesia—stands as a guardian of the world's vital rainforests, their shared ecological destiny a source of collective strength.

Not all alliances are defined by shared vulnerability or geography. The Umbrella Group, led by Japan, represents a different set of priorities, while the Mountain Group—Mongolia and Pakistan—finds common cause in their unique topographical challenges.

In this grand, global negotiation, every voice, every vote, and every alliance is a character in a complex play. The stakes are nothing less than the future of our planet. A single country's plight can be amplified by a group, and a group's collective will can shape the destiny of millions. The tension is palpable: will they unite to create a roar of progress, or will a single voice of dissent bring the entire process to a grinding halt?

"Given that a single voice can block a global decision, what responsibility do these negotiating groups have to find common ground, and how can we, as individuals, hold our own countries accountable within these powerful alliances?"