Blackouts, Broken Promises, and Betrayal: The Untold Scandal Behind Philippine Tourism’s Energy Crisis

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

On December 17, 2024, as tourists filled Siargao’s beaches for the holiday season, the island’s heart stopped beating. A 41-year-old submarine cable, left unreplaced for decades, finally gave out. In a matter of hours, paradise plunged into darkness.

Resorts shuttered. Flights were canceled. Tourists fled. By the time power returned 14 days later, the island had lost ₱1.09 billion.

For residents, this wasn’t just a blackout—it was betrayal.

“This was not an accident,” said one resort manager in General Luna, who asked not to be named. “It was a crime committed by those who knew the cable was dying but did nothing because there was no money in prevention—only in disaster.”

A Timeline of Neglect

The Siargao blackout was decades in the making.

1983 – The submarine cable linking Siargao to the Mindanao grid was installed. It had a lifespan of 25–30 years.

2010s – Warnings surfaced about the cable’s deterioration. Local businesses began lobbying the Siargao Electric Cooperative (SIARELCO) to replace it.

2016–2020 – The National Electrification Administration (NEA) earmarked funds for island grid upgrades, but no comprehensive plan for Siargao was executed.

2021 – Siargao was ravaged by Typhoon Odette. Calls for stronger, more resilient power infrastructure grew louder. The cable, however, was left untouched.

December 2024 – The inevitable collapse arrived, taking down nine municipalities in darkness at the height of the holiday season.

The response? Emergency generators and short-term fixes, contracts awarded to private suppliers with political connections. A temporary patch, not a solution.

Who’s to Blame?

The blackout revealed the ugly ecosystem of neglect and profiteering that plagues Philippine energy governance.

Siargao Electric Cooperative (SIARELCO) – Accused of sitting on warnings for years, prioritizing small repairs over replacement to avoid costly upgrades.

National Electrification Administration (NEA) – Tasked with oversight, yet repeatedly failed to enforce modernization deadlines.

Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) – Allowed power cooperatives to operate despite chronic inefficiency and consumer complaints.

Local Government Units (LGUs) – Poured resources into tourism promotion without demanding parallel infrastructure investment.

Department of Energy (DOE) – Focused heavily on mainland grid projects, leaving island grids underfunded and vulnerable.

“It’s a web of complicity,” said Yla Paras, lead economist of CERP, which conducted the post-blackout study. “No one wants to invest in prevention because there’s no political gain. But when disaster strikes, contracts flow—generators, emergency fuel, quick fixes. It’s a lucrative cycle of failure.”

The Corruption Angle

Electric cooperatives, long criticized for inefficiency, are notorious cash cows for local political clans.

Palawan Electric Cooperative (PALECO) has faced years of consumer protests and Senate hearings for mismanagement. Despite this, it remains operational, protected by local power brokers.

PROSIELCO in Siquijor presided over a month-long blackout in June 2025, leading to a state of calamity. Yet questions linger: why were repair funds delayed, and who profited from emergency generator rentals?

The National Grid Corporation of the Philippines (NGCP), a private concessionaire operating the country’s transmission network, has been repeatedly grilled in Congress over delays in critical projects, including backup lines for Panay and Mindoro.

“These blackouts aren’t just technical failures,” said an industry insider. “They’re engineered vulnerabilities. Someone always profits when the lights go out.”

The Victims: Workers, Tourists, and Communities

The victims of this corruption are ordinary people.

In Siargao, daily business losses ranged from ₱10,000 to ₱30,000. Small resorts closed permanently. Workers were laid off. Fishermen couldn’t store their catch. Clinics rationed medicine as generators sputtered.

Tourists, many from abroad, fled the island—leaving angry reviews that stained Siargao’s reputation. “It’s paradise,” wrote one traveler, “but what good is paradise without power or water?”

Broken Promises

Government officials have promised reform—again. The Department of Tourism (DOT) is now working with the Department of Energy (DOE) on energy audits for resorts. CERP has offered to integrate energy resilience into tourism planning.

But critics say these promises echo those made after Boracay’s closure, after Panay’s blackout, after countless brownouts across Mindoro, Palawan, and Mindanao. Each time, leaders vowed “never again.” Each time, history repeated.

“The Philippines markets itself as a global tourism hub,” said CERP’s Paras. “But how can we compete with Bali, Phuket, or Vietnam when we can’t even keep the lights on?”

The Way Forward—or More Darkness Ahead?

CERP’s recommendations are clear:

Replace and modernize critical island cables before failure.

Invest in renewable microgrids for islands to reduce dependence on outdated infrastructure.

Mandate energy audits before approving new tourism developments.

Reform electric cooperatives to break political capture and enforce accountability.

But will the government listen—or will another island go dark before real reform begins?

Paradise, Exposed

The Siargao blackout stripped away the illusion. Tourism in the Philippines is built on fragile foundations—aging cables, politicized cooperatives, and regulators asleep at the wheel.

Until accountability is enforced, blackouts will remain the true face of Philippine tourism. And each time the lights go out, the country’s promise of “It’s More Fun in the Philippines” becomes harder to believe.

Because paradise without power isn’t just inconvenient.

It’s a national shame.

The Ghost of "Checkoutmaria": A Tale of Public Shame and Vanished Fortunes

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

In the fleeting, curated world of social media, where a life of luxury is often just a tap away, a new kind of ghost has appeared. She is known only by her digital handle, "checkoutmaria," and her dramatic disappearance from the internet is a cautionary tale of what happens when private excess clashes with public fury. Once a prolific flaunter of designer bags and lavish travels, she has now vanished, leaving behind nothing but a deactivated Instagram account and a storm of viral commentary.

The saga began in the echo chambers of Reddit, specifically on the Filipino gossip subreddit r/ChikaPH. A screenshot of "checkoutmaria’s" glamorous lifestyle was posted, a snapshot of opulence: sleek cars, extravagant dining, and a stream of high-end purchases. The comments were swift and brutal. Netizens, frustrated and weary of the country's perennial issues, were quick to connect the dots. They revealed her to be the wife of a major flood control contractor, Alex H. Abelido, the president of Legacy Construction Corporation.

The timing was nothing short of a perfect storm. Just as the nation grappled with persistent flooding and reports of shoddy infrastructure, "checkoutmaria's" unbridled display of wealth became a lightning rod for public anger. The cruel irony was not lost on anyone: while many Filipinos lost their homes and livelihoods to floodwaters, the family of a contractor meant to prevent such a disaster was living a life that seemed utterly detached from the reality of the people. The comments section of the now-deleted post was a battlefield of rage and dark humor, with users questioning her conscience and the source of her fortune. "Gravityyy yung comments di ko alam kung maaawa or matatawa," a netizen wrote, perfectly capturing the conflicted emotion of the moment.

The Unraveling of a Legacy

"Checkoutmaria" was not just a symbol of personal extravagance; she was a face for a much larger, more troubling narrative. Her husband's company, Legacy Construction Corporation, is no small player. According to a recent report, it is one of 15 contractors that have cornered a staggering ₱100 billion of the country's flood control budget since 2022. Legacy alone has been awarded 132 projects totaling nearly ₱9.6 billion. The company has secured numerous contracts in Negros Occidental, an area that, despite the massive investment, saw its projects inundated by recent floods.

This juxtaposition of public funds, private wealth, and infrastructure failure created a groundswell of outrage that traditional media could not have captured as viscerally. The public shaming of "checkoutmaria" was more than just an online mob; it was a furious demand for accountability. It was a raw, unfiltered public audit of a system many feel is corrupt and broken. Her curated images of luxury became evidence in the court of public opinion, each designer bag and lavish trip a direct indictment of the public's suffering.

The Vanishing Act

The pressure was immense. Within days of the Reddit thread going viral, her Instagram account, “checkoutmaria,” was deactivated. Her presence on other platforms like Facebook and TikTok also disappeared. The woman who had meticulously documented her opulent life was now a digital ghost, wiped clean from the internet. The disappearance was sudden and absolute, a surrender to the overwhelming public scrutiny.

The case of "checkoutmaria" is a powerful testament to the double-edged sword of social media. It can be a tool for self-promotion and brand-building, but it is also a relentless public square where anonymity is a myth and accountability can be brutally enforced. Her lavish lifestyle, once a source of envy and aspiration for some, became a public spectacle that exposed the deep fissures between the Philippines' elite and its struggling population.

And so, the online world is left to wonder: Where is she now? And more importantly, what will be the lasting consequence of this dramatic digital disappearance? The comments, a mix of pity and schadenfreude, continue to echo across the internet. But for the ghost of "checkoutmaria," the silence is now deafening. It’s a silence that speaks louder than any Instagram post, a powerful reminder that in the age of viral justice, no one is too rich or too connected to escape the court of public opinion.

Verniece Enciso: Between Grace on Ice and Shadows of Controversy

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

There was a time when Verniece Enciso was just the girl who kept her feelings locked away. Bullied, overlooked, and often misunderstood, she found her escape on the ice rink—where each glide and spin was both a performance and a form of protection. Ice skating was her sanctuary, a place to hide from the noise of a world she couldn’t yet face.

But eight years ago, that changed. Verniece took a leap, not on ice this time, but into the world of blogging. What began as an outlet became a platform for her to narrate her story, discover herself, and find validation beyond the superficial metrics of likes and followers. “I realized that despite the numbers of social media, the only validation that matters is the one I give myself,” she shared, recounting the journey that transformed her from a silent skater into a storyteller.

Yet behind the curated posts and inspirational words lies a controversy that refuses to be ignored. In one startlingly candid moment, Verniece remarked: “I would like to thank my Dad for being my unending ATM machine.”

For her followers, it was shocking—some dismissed it as a tone-deaf joke, while others saw it as an unguarded admission of privilege. But the statement sparked deeper questions, especially when viewed against the backdrop of long-standing allegations that her family’s affluence was tied to corruption.

Whispers have long circulated in political and business circles that the Enciso family benefited from bogus flood control projects—a web allegedly orchestrated by unscrupulous government officials, compliant DPWH insiders, and their contractor allies. These projects, critics say, were designed not to protect communities from disaster, but to line the pockets of those who colluded in their execution.

It is within this cloud of suspicion that Verniece’s controversial “ATM machine” quip takes on a sharper edge. Was it an innocent slip, a daughter’s jest about a supportive father, or a Freudian crack in the glossy veneer of privilege—a hint at wealth sourced from the very corruption that has long bled Filipino taxpayers dry?

The juxtaposition is stark: a young woman who speaks about empowerment, growth, and self-validation, yet whose rise is inexorably tied to a family name shadowed by allegations of graft. For many, it’s a reminder of how the fortunes of a privileged few are too often linked to the misfortunes of the many. While ordinary citizens wade through knee-deep floods, stories abound of families growing richer from projects supposedly meant to solve those very problems.

And yet, Verniece’s personal journey remains layered. She was once the bullied girl who struggled to find her voice. She did the hard work of opening herself up to the world, risking vulnerability in an arena where judgment is relentless. But the reality is that personal strength and public narrative do not exist in a vacuum. They are influenced, and sometimes tainted, by the sources of privilege that pave the way.

Verniece Enciso’s story, then, is both inspiring and unsettling—a portrait of a woman striving for authenticity while tethered to controversies not of her own making, but impossible to ignore. She embodies the paradox of modern influence: the pursuit of self-validation in a world where legacy, power, and privilege often set the stage long before the individual even begins the performance.

In the end, her story is a mirror held up to Philippine society itself—where beauty and grace can coexist with scandal and corruption, where voices break free even as shadows linger, and where the truth is rarely as simple as it seems.