BREAKING

Wednesday, August 27, 2025

Leandro Leviste: From Gifted Child to Solar Visionary and Political Maverick


Wazzup Pilipinas!?




The Early Spark of Promise

Leandro Antonio Legarda Leviste entered the world on March 18, 1993, born into a union of privilege and public prominence—his mother, Senator Loren Legarda, and his father, former Batangas Governor Antonio Leviste. Even as a child, Leandro’s talent was on display: he featured as a gifted child in a Wyeth Promil TV commercial in 2003, a hint at the extraordinary path that lay ahead 


A Departure from Yale, a Leap toward Solar Empowerment

At age 20, Leviste made a radical departure from Yale University, leaving his political science studies behind to launch Solar Philippines in 2013 


His vision? To slash the Philippines' notoriously high electricity costs by harnessing the sun. It was a disruptive move, but one rooted in ambition and bold innovation.


Building Southeast Asia’s Largest Solar Power Enterprise

Under his leadership, Solar Philippines grew rapidly. Among its groundbreaking projects were the Calatagan Solar Farm (completed in 2016) and the Tarlac Solar Farm (operational by 2019) 


In December 2021, Solar Philippines’ subsidiary SP New Energy Corporation (SPNEC) listed on the Philippine Stock Exchange—marking Leviste as the youngest-ever chairman and CEO of a listed company in the country’s history 


Under his stewardship, Solar Philippines also earned the reputation as Southeast Asia’s largest solar developer 


From Renewable Energy to Public Service

By 2023–2024, Leviste began divesting portions of SPNEC, selling a controlling stake to Meralco, and orchestrating major share transfers that shifted control toward the Meralco-backed conglomerate MPIC 


Yet, his entrepreneurial spirit persisted, with forays into media and agriculture ― including stakes in ABS-CBN and Central Azucarera Don Pedro 


In October 2024, the 31-year-old Leviste formally filed his Certificate of Candidacy for Batangas’s 1st District—vowing to transform his home region through economic development, infrastructure, and inclusive growth 


A Historic Political Breakthrough

In the 2025 midterm elections, Leandro Leviste scored a landslide victory, garnering an unprecedented 268,764 votes—approximately 75% of the total—defeating incumbent Eric Buhain and flipping a district long held by the Ermita and Apacible dynasties 


His win marked the first time since 1972 that the district chose a representative outside those families—a generational shift now etched into Batangas history 


From Bills to Bravery: A Freshman's Defining Moment

Sworn into office on June 30, 2025, Leviste wasted no time introducing bold legislation—his first bill, House Bill No. 27, proposed a monthly allowance for every Filipino student, from kindergarten to college—a populist yet pragmatic vision to address inequality 


But it was the drama that unfolded in August that truly defined his tenure. When the DPWH Batangas 1st District Engineer, Abelardo Calalo, offered him a ₱3.126-million bribe to quash an investigation into flood-control contracts, Leviste orchestrated a dramatic sting—with the help of the PNP-CIDG and NBI. On August 22, 2025, in Taal, Calalo delivered pre-marked bills—and was immediately apprehended 


Calalo was promptly suspended and charged under the Revised Penal Code and the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. Leviste urged Calalo to become a state witness, hinting that this may be only a window into a much larger corruption network 



A Defining Act of Courage and Political Acumen

What unfolded wasn’t merely a courtroom drama—it was a public statement: Leandro Leviste could not be bought. In a society fatigued by corruption, his decisive action cast him not only as a new kind of wealthy scion, but also a fearless public servant who wields his privilege in service of the truth.


Narrative in Focus

Leandro Leviste’s arc is rich in contrasts:


From gifted child to elite milieu, yet rebelling against expectations by dropping out of Yale.


From billionaire entrepreneur to public servant, trading solar farms for public office.


From youth to authority, he channeled ambition not for self-amplification, but for systemic change.


His landslide election was more than just a personal triumph—it signaled a public hunger for fresh leadership, a break from dynastic politics. His first legislative proposal and his hard-hitting anti-corruption mobilization demonstrated he’s not just talk—but action.


The gravity of the Calalo operation cannot be overstated. It didn’t just topple one corrupt official, but exposed a rot that often goes unnoticed. It thrust Leviste into the spotlight as a politician unafraid to challenge entrenched systems—and in doing so, made clear that in his district, and perhaps the country, not everyone has a price.


Leandro Antonio Legarda Leviste is not merely a man of privilege, nor a recycled political actor. He is the embodiment of something rarer in Philippine politics—a self-made visionary who turned business acumen into public accountability.


His life defies easy labels: the affluent child who became a renewable-energy trailblazer, who then became history’s youngest PSE-listed CEO—and now a congressman with the courage to arrest an engineer offering bribes. His story is one of transformation, from electrifying energy to energizing hope.


For Batangueños, his resounding victory was a bet on leadership unbound by the old guard. With valor that day in Taal, Leviste proved: their bet might just be paying off.


1. House Bill No. 27: Costs, Strategy, and Global Parallels

A. The Price Tag for National Implementation

Leandro Leviste’s House Bill No. 27, introduced on June 30, 2025, proposes a ₱1,000 monthly stipend for every Filipino student from kindergarten to college, contingent on at least 80% attendance. It aims to offset essential expenses—food, transportation, school supplies, and possibly tech or other educational needs.


The estimated number of beneficiaries ranges between 25 to 30 million students, translating to an annual cost of ₱25 billion to ₱300 billion. 


DepEd has publicly endorsed the concept, though it has acknowledged implications for budget planning. Critics highlight that the allowance could instead fund infrastructure like classrooms—e.g., 15,000 classrooms cost around ₱24 billion—while proponents argue for its potential as educational investment. 


This wide range likely stems from differing assumptions about coverage—basic education versus the entire student population.


B. Leviste’s Ground-Level Push

Before the measure progresses further, Leviste’s Lingkod Legarda Leviste Foundation began implementing the allowance locally—disbursing ₱1,000 each to over 150,000 students across Batangas’s 1st District in July 2025, without resorting to government funds. It demonstrates his political will to make the proposal tangible. 


C. Global Visions: How Does It Compare?

Universal or targeted student support has precedent globally:


Brazil’s Bolsa Família, a conditional cash transfer (CCT) program, was credited with cutting the poverty rate from 26.1% to 14.1% between 2003 and 2009. Its design incorporated school and health requirements to enhance impact. 


Several U.S. states are experimenting with Guaranted Basic Income (GBI) schemes—offering monthly cash ($500–$2,000) to specific groups like students, families, or low-income populations, often unrestricted in use. 


Unlike universal UBI schemes, Leviste’s proposal is conditional—requiring attendance—and targeted explicitly to students, aligning more with Bolsa Família’s intent-based support than broad unconditional payouts.


D. Cost-Benefit Perspective

Cost: ₱25–300 billion annually, depending on coverage scope.


Benefit Potential:


May decrease absenteeism and dropout rates.


Eases financial burden on families.


Potential long-term economic gains via better-educated graduates.


Symbolic value: education as a high national priority.


The success of such universal aid hinges on responsive delivery systems, accurate targeting to avoid misuse or double-dipping (a real concern in subsidy programs) and sustainable funding—whether via taxation, borrowing, or dividend from economic growth.


2. Terra Solar & Renewable Energy Scaling: Powering the Philippines Forward

A. Terra Solar: Scope and Scale

The Terra Solar Project, spearheaded by SP New Energy Corp. (SPNEC) under Leviste and Manuel V. Pangilinan, is a ₱200-billion, 3,500-hectare solar and battery storage ecosystem.


It aims to deliver a groundbreaking 3,500 MWp of solar power with 4,500 MWh of battery storage, slated for phased completion by 2026–2027. 


The project is tied into the Luzon grid via the Nagsaag–San Jose 500-kV transmission line. Meralco plans to source 850 MW from this output. 


B. Beyond Terra: What Lies Ahead?

Discussions for Terra Solar 2 are underway—a potential second mega project likely in Batangas or South Luzon, on land already in Leviste’s possession. Though not as large as the original, it would still span several thousand hectares. 


C. Energy Strategy Implications

Clean Energy Transition: Terra Solar sets the Philippines on a path toward renewable energy dominance.


Grid Stability: Massive battery storage addresses intermittency—a critical technical and policy advance.


Market Influence: By supplying Meralco (Luzon’s largest utility), it helps shape pricing and clean energy procurement standards.


Business Model: Demonstrates how private-public synergy (SPNEC–Meralco) can financially and operationally sustain large-scale RE projects.


Leviste's parallel investment in human capital (via education reform) and physical capital (via renewable energy infrastructure) paints a cohesive picture of progressive leadership. Both proposals aim to future-proof the Philippines—one through empowered citizens, the other through sustainable energy systems.


Silent Giants on Sacred Soil: The Banahaw Wind Power Saga


Wazzup Pilipinas!?




A titan emerges on the horizon: 38 colossal wind turbines, each towering like a pristine 40-storey building, dottingl nearly 4,536 hectares across ten barangays of Sariaya-Tayabas, Quezon. GigaWind4, Inc.—a subsidiary of Ayala’s GigaWind4 under ACEN—plans to invest a staggering ₱24.5 billion. The turbines promise 247 MW of clean energy, with 120 m towers and 171 m blades, connected by 36 km of new roads, substations, storage sites, and worker quarters. But a shadow looms: 28 turbines will lie within a mere 3 km of the Mt. Banahaw–San Cristobal Protected Landscape. A hallowed mountain and sacred sanctuary, Banahaw guards vital watersheds, cradles endemic species, and embodies culture, faith, and biodiversity.


Why Some View It as a Ray of Hope

Spearheading Renewable Energy Growth

In a country striving to transition from fossil fuels, a nearly quarter-gigawatt wind farm is a compelling leap toward cleaner energy.


Economic Uplift

The ₱24.5 billion investment means jobs—both temporary and permanent—plus activity for local suppliers and infrastructure improvements that could benefit surrounding communities.


Climate Leadership

Wind energy could help the Philippines advance climate commitments, diversifying its energy mix and reducing reliance on polluting sources.


Why Many Cry Out in Alarm

1. Ecological Toll on a Biodiversity Hotspot

Mt. Banahaw–San Cristobal Protected Landscape spans about 10,900 hectares and shelters a staggering array of life—endemic rodents, frogs, skinks, and threatened birds like the Philippine eagle, cockatoo, and flame-breasted fruit dove 


Its forests and mossy peaks are a living tapestry of unique flora and fauna, with people holding it sacred for spirituality and pilgrimage 


Fragmented habitats from turbine installation and roads risk isolating wildlife and degrading critical ecological corridors. Birds and bats face fatal collisions with spinning blades. Even accelerated energy development elsewhere has sparked warnings about impacts on wildlife-rich areas 


2. Watershed Disruption and Erosion Risks

Banahaw is far more than a mountain—it is a life-sustaining “water-volcano” (Vulcan de Agua), feeding springs, creeks, rivers, and ultimately Laguna de Bay and Tayabas Bay 


It supports domestic water needs, agriculture, and aquifers for millions of people.


But 36 km of access roads and uprooting vegetation can worsen slope stability, trigger erosion, degrade soil, and fragment the watershed—jeopardizing water flow, quality, and flood regulation.


3. Cultural and Spiritual Erosion

Mount Banahaw is revered—not merely for its religious significance but as a cultural touchstone. Pilgrims and devotees gravitate to its trails, shrines, and caves. Introducing towering turbines could shatter the spiritual landscape, eroding both peace and heritage.


4. Regulatory and Legacy Threats

Banahaw’s protected status hasn’t shielded it from assaults. Illegal quarrying resurged in April 2024, with dynamite blasts threatening homes and disturbing the buffer zone 


This underscores the fragility of enforcement in the area. If quarrying can scar Banahaw, what of wind energy infrastructure?


5. A Broader Pattern of Conflict Between Conservation and Renewables

Aksyon Klima Pilipinas cautions that—even with protocols—placing renewable projects near protected areas poses real dangers to ecosystems and the communities depending on them 


Verdict: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks?

Short answer: No. The stakes—fragile water systems, sacred biodiversity, and cultural heritage—are too high.


A renewable project gains nobility when it protects as much as it powers. This venture risks sacrificing Banahaw’s unique ecology and spiritual sanctuary.


Community Reflections: Let the Voices Rise

From local buzz to digital echoes:


“Malaki ang epekto nito sa environment… nagiging sanhi pa ng erosion, landslides, flooding.”

— concerned netizen reflecting fears from high-impact development 


“Illegal quarrying… maraming residente ang nag-aalala… nasisira na ang lugar… maraming maliliit na magsasaka ang nadadamay.”

— worried resident on Reddit, lamenting damages caused by unregulated activity near Banahaw 


These voices remind us it’s not just about power output—it’s about preserving lives, livelihoods, and the sacred.


But Wait—Is There AN Alternative?

Absolutely.


1. Site Reconsideration

Let’s explore wind-friendly locations away from protected areas.


2. Rigorous Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA)

If pursued, they must be thorough, transparent, and co-created with communities and environmental experts.


3. Micro-Renewables & Diverse Energy Mix

Distributed energy, solar micro-grids, and rooftop systems could offer cleaner alternatives with less ecological footprint.


4. Strengthening Protected Area Governance

Banahaw’s boundary enforcement, buffer zones, and management plans must be reinforced to counter new threats.


A Call to the Community

Now it’s your turn to speak:


Where do you stand? Is climate action worth risking Banahaw’s soul?


What do you fear? Could our water, wildlife, or ways of life suffer?


What do you hope for? A greener future without sacrificing our sacred mountain?


Let’s amplify our voices, unite for solutions that honor both progress and preservation.


Sabayan natin ito—para sa maiingat, makabayan, at makalikha'ng proyekto. 

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

Waste Crisis in the Philippines: A Call for Real Action Before We Drown in Our Own Garbage


Wazzup Pilipinas!?



The Philippines is at a breaking point. Our waste management system is groaning under the weight of plastic mountains, toxic e-waste streams, and landfills bursting at the seams. For decades, laws have been passed and policies drafted — yet the garbage piles keep growing, and our rivers, coasts, and communities continue to suffer.


As Ross Flores Del Rosario, founder of Wazzup Pilipinas, I see this crisis not just as an environmental issue, but as a threat to public health, sustainable tourism, and the very dignity of our people. We cannot claim to be the “Pearl of the Orient Seas” if we are also the “Plastic Dump of Asia.”


The Harsh Reality: Where We Stand Today

The Ecological Solid Waste Management Act (RA 9003), passed in 2000, envisioned a system of segregation, recycling, and barangay-level facilities. Twenty-five years later, many cities and towns still rely on open dumps or barely compliant disposal sites. The World Bank and local audits confirm what we all know: implementation is uneven, underfunded, and overwhelmed.


In 2022, the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Law (RA 11898) finally forced corporations to take responsibility for plastic packaging waste. This was a game-changing move, but in practice, implementation is still sluggish, recycling markets are weak, and millions of sachets and single-use plastics flood stores daily.


The Worst Offenders: Plastic and E-Waste

Plastics: From sachet shampoo to single-use cups, plastics remain the most visible and stubborn form of waste. A 2024 national roadmap seeks to curb single-use plastics, but unless manufacturers redesign packaging and LGUs get serious about segregation, plastics will keep clogging our drainage and poisoning our seas.


E-waste: Mobile phones, computers, and appliances are discarded faster than ever. The Global E-waste Monitor 2024 shows the Philippines is one of Southeast Asia’s top generators. Informal junkshops dismantle them with bare hands, exposing workers and communities to lead, mercury, and other toxins. Safe, formal take-back systems are still lacking.


Hazardous waste: From hospitals to construction, toxic waste streams remain under-regulated, with gaps in disposal infrastructure that endanger communities.


Why Solutions Stall: Policy and Infrastructure Gaps

Fragmented Governance – RA 9003 relies on LGUs, but many lack the money, training, or will to implement segregation and recovery systems.


Lack of Recycling Facilities – Even when waste is collected, there are too few sorting plants, reprocessing facilities, or markets for recycled products.


Weak Public Behavior – Segregation remains low, consumer habits unchanged, and businesses continue flooding markets with cheap disposables.


Informal Sector Neglect – Waste pickers do the heavy lifting of recycling, but without recognition, support, or safety nets.


The Way Forward: What the Philippines Must Do

This is not a lost battle. In fact, the Philippines can lead Asia in building a truly circular economy — if we act decisively now.


Calls-to-Action from Wazzup Pilipinas:

Turn Laws into Action, Not Paper – Fully fund RA 9003 and the EPR law. LGUs must be given real resources, while corporations should be audited and penalized for failing to meet recovery targets.


Prioritize Plastics and E-Waste – Create nationwide collection and safe recycling hubs. Stop passing the burden to consumers and barangays alone.


Empower the Informal Sector – Recognize waste pickers as essential workers. Provide training, protective gear, and fair pay.


Invest in Technology and Infrastructure – Build modern material recovery facilities, chemical recycling pilots, and safe e-waste processing plants.


Strengthen International Collaboration – Partner with ASEAN neighbors for regional e-waste solutions, attract global investment in recycling technologies, and link waste projects to climate financing opportunities.


A Narrow Window for Change

The 2020s have been called the “decisive decade” for climate and sustainability. For the Philippines, it is also the decisive decade for waste.


If we fail, we condemn future generations to live in a country buried under its own garbage. But if we succeed — through law, science, and citizen power — we can transform waste from a shameful liability into a driver of innovation, green jobs, and cleaner communities.


The choice is ours, and the time is now.


Sources and References

Philippine Plastic Roadmap, NSWMC (2024) – https://nswmc.emb.gov.ph


Global E-waste Monitor 2024, United Nations University – https://ewastemonitor.info/


Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (2024) – https://pcij.org


World Bank: Solid Waste Management in the Philippines – https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/publication/philippines-waste-management


Republic Act No. 9003 – Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000 – https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2000/ra_9003_2000.html


Republic Act No. 11898 – Extended Producer Responsibility Act of 2022 – https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2022/ra_11898_2022.html


UNIDO on E-waste in the Philippines – https://www.unido.org/stories/philippines-e-waste-management


Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas Wazzup Pilipinas and the Umalohokans. Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas celebrating 10th year of online presence
 
Copyright © 2013 Wazzup Pilipinas News and Events
Design by FBTemplates | BTT