Drowning in Neglect: Architect Felino “Jun” Palafox Exposes the Real Reasons Behind Metro Manila’s Never-Ending Flood Crisis

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

Metro Manila doesn’t just flood—it drowns in a deluge of bad decisions.

Every monsoon season, residents of the National Capital Region brace for the inevitable. Streets transform into rivers, homes are swallowed by muddy water, and lives grind to a halt under the weight of calamity. The people have become numb to it, but one man refuses to accept it as normal: Architect Felino “Jun” Palafox Jr., the country’s foremost urban planner, who has been sounding the alarm for decades.

In a city drowning not just in water but in apathy, Palafox’s voice rises like a warning siren—one that, tragically, continues to fall on deaf ears.

The Blueprint of a Disaster

According to Palafox, the recurring floods in Metro Manila are not acts of God but the consequences of man’s ignorance, greed, and failure to plan. “This is not climate change alone—it’s character change, leadership failure, and a loss of foresight,” he says.

Let’s be clear: Metro Manila is not merely waterlogged. It is suffocating beneath the ruins of what should have been a modern, resilient metropolis. Palafox lays out the damning reasons why:

1. Natural Waterways Turned Into Concrete Graves

Once crisscrossed by clean rivers and esteros, Metro Manila has become a graveyard of natural drainage systems. Palafox reveals that countless rivers, creeks, and lakes have been illegally occupied by informal settlers, and, in some cases, by government projects and private developers that paid no respect to the natural flow of water.

"Nature has a memory," Palafox says. "It will always take back what is hers."

2. A City Built on Flawed Foundations

Metro Manila is not just overpopulated—it’s poorly planned. Palafox is blunt: “We built on floodplains, we ignored topography, we allowed buildings where water should’ve flowed.” He laments that many development decisions were made without consulting professional urban planners, or worse, went against their recommendations.

The result? A city designed for failure, where rain doesn’t just fall—it stays, stagnates, and strikes back.

3. Drainage Systems from a Bygone Era

Imagine using a cellphone from the 1970s in today’s hyper-connected world. That’s the kind of logic we’re applying to Metro Manila’s decades-old drainage systems. Designed for a much smaller population and milder rainfall, the city’s outdated pipes and canals are no match for the wrath of today’s supercharged monsoons.

Palafox warns: “You can’t solve 21st-century problems with 20th-century infrastructure.”

4. Concrete Over Green: The Death of Absorption

What used to be open parks, trees, and grassy lots are now parking spaces and condominiums. “We have paved over our future,” Palafox laments. Without green spaces to absorb rain, water has only one path—straight into our streets and homes.

Every lost tree, every razed field, is another nail in the coffin of Metro Manila’s flood resilience.

5. Reclamation Projects: Sinking for the Sake of Progress

Palafox has long opposed the aggressive push for reclamation along Manila Bay, calling them “an invitation to disaster.” These projects block tidal flows, disrupt marine ecosystems, and cause flooding to rebound inland with greater force.

“We are creating land for the rich by drowning the poor,” he says with chilling clarity.

6. Choked by Our Own Waste

Floods in Metro Manila are as much a garbage problem as they are a rainfall problem. Clogged esteros, canals, and drainage lines are overflowing not just with water, but with plastic, junk, and untreated waste.

Palafox does not mince words: “We’re drowning in our own garbage—and no one is being held accountable.”

7. Politics Over Planning

Perhaps the most frustrating truth Palafox lays bare is this: the problem is not a lack of plans. The blueprints exist. The solutions are known. But they are ignored, shelved, or replaced every time a new administration takes office.

"We suffer from a fatal discontinuity of governance,” he asserts. “Urban planning is not a political platform—it is a life-saving necessity."

8. Climate Change: The Final, Rising Wave

Though he emphasizes that most of the flooding is preventable, Palafox also acknowledges that climate change is magnifying everything. Stronger typhoons. Heavier rainfall. Unpredictable weather. Metro Manila, already crippled by bad planning, is now facing a monster that knows no boundaries.

“We built a fragile city. Now the planet is testing it,” Palafox warns.

From Warnings to Action: Will We Listen?

Palafox has presented dozens of master plans for Metro Manila and other vulnerable cities. He has proposed flood control parks, urban forests, elevated walkways, and disaster-resilient communities. But most of these plans gather dust in government drawers while floods continue to ravage the nation’s capital.

His final message? “We don’t lack master plans. We lack leadership, integrity, and the courage to do what’s right—even if it’s unpopular.”

As another rainy season looms and Metro Manila holds its breath, one thing remains painfully clear: we’re not just victims of floods—we’re victims of our own failure to prepare.

And if we continue to ignore the wisdom of people like Felino “Jun” Palafox, the next deluge may be the one we can’t recover from.

When Law Meets Truth: Why the Impeachment Against Sara Duterte Is Both Legal and Right

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

In a political landscape often clouded by noise and manipulation, one golden rule stands tall in the pursuit of justice: Before you apply the law, make sure the facts are clear.

This principle is not just a legal technicality—it is the very foundation of a just society. It reminds lawmakers, judges, and citizens alike that no amount of eloquence or legal maneuvering can substitute for the truth. When the facts are murky, justice is threatened. When the facts are deliberately distorted, the law becomes a weapon rather than a shield.

But what happens when both the facts and the law align? Then, the path forward becomes not just legally sound but morally undeniable.

This is precisely the case in the brewing impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte.

A Legal and Factual Reckoning

In legal circles, there’s a well-known saying: “If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the facts are against you, argue the law.” It’s a clever turn of phrase that reveals how lawyers often maneuver through gray areas of justice.

But here’s the thing—when both the facts and the law are against you, there is nowhere left to hide. Conversely, when both are on your side, your case becomes not just strong—it becomes bulletproof.

That is the advantage now held by those pushing for the impeachment of Sara Duterte. This is not a matter of political vendetta. It is not rooted in partisanship. It is a constitutional process built upon verifiable facts and grounded in the law.

Why the Impeachment Is Constitutional

Let’s start with the legal foundation.

The 1987 Philippine Constitution, in Article XI, Section 2, clearly states that the Vice President is among the officials subject to impeachment for “culpable violation of the Constitution, treason, bribery, graft and corruption, other high crimes, or betrayal of public trust.”

The allegations against Sara Duterte—ranging from questionable use of confidential funds to involvement in shadow operations inconsistent with her role—strike at the heart of this provision. If proven, they don’t just suggest misconduct. They indicate a betrayal of public trust at the highest level.

The argument that her impeachment is unconstitutional holds no water. The Constitution is explicit. There are no ambiguities in this matter. The only question now is whether the facts support the charges.

And they do.

The Weight of the Evidence

From the controversial P125 million in confidential funds allocated in a single day to her use of the Department of Education as a political springboard while continuing to command military-style security operations, the facts paint a troubling picture.

Multiple reports, official documents, and testimonies already in the public domain raise serious questions about the ethical and legal boundaries of her office. These are not wild accusations. They are data-backed, well-sourced concerns that warrant judicial scrutiny.

More importantly, this isn’t just about numbers and paperwork—it’s about public money, public power, and public trust.

What’s at Stake

To downplay the gravity of this impeachment attempt is to downplay the people’s right to hold their leaders accountable. It is to say that no matter how clear the facts are, no matter how violated the law may be, some figures are beyond reproach.

That idea is an affront to democracy.

We’ve seen it before—leaders exalted as untouchable, shielded by loyalty and fear, until the walls finally came crashing down under the weight of truth.

Sara Duterte may still command influence and popularity in some quarters, but popularity is not immunity. Not from the Constitution. Not from the truth. And certainly not from justice.

The Moral Imperative

When the facts are wrong, there is no law to apply.

When the facts are unclear, the court becomes a theater.

But when the facts are strong and the law is clear, silence becomes complicity.

The pro-impeachment forces are not just engaged in a legal battle—they are defending the very integrity of the constitutional system. In doing so, they are sending a clear message: No one—not even the Vice President—is above the law.

Conclusion: The Law Is Watching, So Is the Nation

This is not just a legal proceeding. It is a national moment of reckoning.

Sara Duterte’s impeachment is not about politics. It is about accountability. It is about sending a message to every elected official, now and in the future, that facts matter, laws matter, and the people—especially in a democracy—matter most.

The Constitution is clear. The facts are damning. The law is on the people's side.

Now is the time to let it speak.

Let history show that when the nation needed clarity, it did not look away.

"Double Whammy: Metro Manila on the Brink of Disaster"

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

A hauntingly vivid image depicts the dire reality facing Metro Manila, one of the most densely populated urban areas in the world. A giant wave, we can label as "poor flood control," threatens to engulf the city, leaving a trail of destruction in its wake. But what's even more ominous is the looming presence of an even bigger wave, symbolizing the existential threat of "climate change".

This is a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of inadequate infrastructure and the growing menace of climate-related disasters. As the world grapples with the challenges of rising temperatures, sea-level rise, and extreme weather events, Metro Manila stands as a poignant example of the urgent need for action.

The Perfect Storm

The image captures the perfect storm brewing over Metro Manila. Poor flood control measures, inadequate infrastructure, and rapid urbanization have created a toxic mix that puts the city at risk of catastrophic flooding. The giant wave about to crash down on the city is a metaphor for the systemic failures that have been ignored for far too long.

But the bigger wave looming in the background represents the existential threat of climate change. Rising global temperatures are melting polar ice caps, causing sea levels to rise, and increasing the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events. Metro Manila, being a coastal city, is particularly vulnerable to these changes.

A Call to Action

The image is a clarion call to policymakers, urban planners, and citizens to take immediate action. It's a reminder that the consequences of inaction will be catastrophic. The time for finger-pointing and blame-shifting is over; it's time for collective action and responsible governance.

As the world watches, Metro Manila's struggle against the dual threats of poor flood control and climate change serves as a microcosm for the global challenge. Will we learn from this stark warning, or will we wait until it's too late?

The fate of Metro Manila hangs in the balance. The clock is ticking. It's time to act.

What Can Be Done?

To mitigate the impact of flooding and climate change, the following measures can be taken:

1. Invest in infrastructure: Upgrade flood control systems, build resilient infrastructure, and invest in green spaces to absorb excess water.

2. Climate-resilient planning: Incorporate climate change projections into urban planning, ensuring that new developments are designed to withstand extreme weather events.

3. Community engagement: Educate citizens about flood risks and involve them in disaster preparedness and response efforts.

4. Policy reforms: Enact and enforce policies that prioritize climate resilience, sustainable development, and environmental protection.

The image serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need for action. Will we heed the warning, or will we wait until the waves of disaster crash down on us? The choice is ours.