The Concentration of Power: Examining Governance Dynamics in Davao City

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

Recent local elections in Davao City have resulted in a notable political development: multiple members of the Duterte family have secured key positions across the city's governance structure. This electoral outcome raises important questions about power distribution and democratic checks and balances in one of the Philippines' major urban centers.

Rodrigo Duterte - ran for Mayor

Sebastian "Baste" Duterte - ran for Vice Mayor

Paolo Duterte - ran for 1st District representative

Omar Duterte - ran for 2nd District representative

Rodrigo Duterte II - ran for Councilor

A Family's Political Footprint

The recent elections saw Duterte family members winning positions including mayor, vice mayor, and district representatives. This concentration of leadership roles within a single family represents a significant consolidation of political power in Davao's municipal government.

Political analysts note that while family political dynasties are not uncommon in Philippine politics, the breadth of positions now held simultaneously by members of the same family in Davao presents a distinct governance scenario.

The Democratic Balance Question

Democratic systems typically rely on the separation of powers and institutional checks and balances to ensure accountability. When multiple key positions fall under the influence of a single family or political group, traditional oversight mechanisms may face challenges.

"Political diversity in local government often creates natural accountability systems," explains Dr. Maria Santos, a political science professor from the University of the Philippines. "When various positions are held by individuals with different perspectives and constituencies, it creates an environment where decisions require greater consensus and scrutiny."

Historical Context of Davao Governance

Davao City has long been associated with the Duterte family's political influence. The family has maintained a significant presence in local politics for decades, with Rodrigo Duterte himself having served as mayor for seven terms before becoming President of the Philippines in 2016.

Supporters point to development projects and the city's reputation for order during this period, while critics have raised concerns about governance style and the consolidation of authority.

Looking Forward: Governance Implications

The concentration of elected positions within one family raises several governance considerations:

Decision-making dynamics: With family members in multiple leadership roles, how will dissenting views be represented in policy discussions?

Institutional independence: Will city departments and agencies maintain operational autonomy from centralized family influence?

Citizen representation: How will diverse community interests be balanced when leadership shares family connections?

The Broader Philippine Context

This situation reflects broader patterns in Philippine politics, where family political dynasties have been a persistent feature of the democratic landscape. The Philippine Constitution contains anti-dynasty provisions, but implementing legislation has faced challenges.

Citizen Perspectives

Davao residents hold varying views on this political development. Some express confidence in continued stability and development under familiar leadership, while others voice concerns about concentrated authority and democratic representation.

"What matters ultimately is whether the leadership, regardless of family ties, can deliver effective governance and public services that benefit all citizens," notes civic engagement advocate Juan Reyes.

As Davao moves forward under its newly elected leadership, the effectiveness of governance, the responsiveness to diverse community needs, and the maintenance of democratic principles will be closely observed by citizens, civil society, and political analysts alike.

Who Are Part of the Impeachment Court? Meet the 24 Senators Set to Judge Sara Duterte

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

In a moment that promises to be a political turning point in Philippine history, the Senate gears up to assume its solemn constitutional role as the impeachment court for Vice President Sara Duterte. Mark your calendars: July 21 is not just another day in politics—it is the day the nation holds its breath.

With the 2025 midterm elections concluded, the Philippine Senate is now composed of 24 seated members, each one carrying the enormous responsibility of serving as a judge in what could be one of the most controversial and consequential trials the country has witnessed in recent memory.

Below is the full roster of senators—both incumbents and newly elected—who will weigh the evidence, interpret the law, and ultimately decide the political fate of the second-highest official in the land.

Returning Powerhouses and Veteran Lawmakers

(Senators currently serving in office)

Alan Peter Cayetano

JV Ejercito

Chiz Escudero

Jinggoy Estrada

Win Gatchalian

Risa Hontiveros

Loren Legarda

Robin Padilla

Raffy Tulfo

Joel Villanueva

Mark Villar

Migz Zubiri

These are the seasoned political figures who have already proven themselves in legislative debates and committee investigations. But in an impeachment court, they are stripped of partisanship—they must judge based solely on the Constitution and evidence presented.

The New Senate-Elect Faces

(Newly elected senators set to assume office before the trial)

Bong Go

Bam Aquino

Ronald “Bato” Dela Rosa

Erwin Tulfo

Kiko Pangilinan

Rodante Marcoleta

Ping Lacson

Tito Sotto

Pia Cayetano

Camille Villar

Lito Lapid

Imee Marcos

These figures—some returning, some newcomers—represent a broad spectrum of ideologies and public personas. From hardline conservatives to centrist reformers, the diversity of this impeachment court could make or break the trial's impartiality and outcome.

The High-Stakes Political Climate

This trial is not just about Sara Duterte. It is about the integrity of democratic institutions and the rule of law in a polarized Philippines. With strong political dynasties, alliances, and rivalries all at play, every statement, every vote, and every procedural decision will be watched, analyzed, and remembered.

Will loyalty to party and personality overshadow justice? Or will this group of 24 rise above the noise and deliver a fair verdict based on truth?

What’s Next?

As the trial kicks off on July 21, expect high drama, fiery exchanges, and perhaps, a few unexpected twists. Constitutional experts, political analysts, and everyday Filipinos will be glued to the screens and updates. The senators, now transformed into judges, will have to walk a tightrope between political survival and national duty.

Whatever the outcome, history will remember how these 24 senators carried the weight of a nation's hope—and whether they chose the path of justice or politics.

Stay tuned. The courtroom is about to open, and the eyes of the Filipino people are watching.

Follow Wazzup Pilipinas for real-time updates, exclusive insights, and behind-the-scenes access to one of the most critical trials in recent Philippine history.

Power in the Margins: The 2% Rule and the Rise of the Few in the Party-list Race

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

In a nation where democracy is measured not just by voices but by representation, the party-list system was envisioned as a powerful equalizer — a mechanism meant to give marginalized sectors a seat at the legislative table. But in recent elections, the reality paints a dramatically different picture. Power remains concentrated, and the 2% threshold — once seen as a key that unlocks representation — has become more symbolic than decisive.

As the results of the latest elections unfold, only six party-list groups have managed to clear the coveted 2% vote share, guaranteeing them one seat each in the House of Representatives. These groups are:

Akbayan Citizens’ Action Party (AKBAYAN)

Duterte Youth Party-List (DUTERTE YOUTH)

Tingog Sinirangan (TINGOG)

Pagtibayin at Palaguin ang Pangkabuhayang Pilipino (4PS)

Anti-Crime and Terrorism-Community Involvement and Support, Inc. (ACT-CIS)

Ako Bicol Political Party (AKO BIKOL)

These six parties are now poised to wield substantial influence, particularly the top-performing among them who may receive up to three seats, the constitutional cap for party-list representation per group. But beyond this elite circle lies a striking democratic dilemma — the remaining seats in the 20% party-list allocation of the House will be filled by groups that didn’t even reach the 2% mark.

The Numbers Behind the Power

The 2% vote share rule is not just a benchmark — it’s a promise. A promise that those who genuinely command public support earn their rightful place in Congress. But what happens when that threshold is met by only a few? The Commission on Elections (Comelec) is then forced to allocate seats to lower-performing groups just to complete the constitutionally mandated 20% party-list representation.

This is not a fluke. It’s a pattern.

In the 2022 elections, only six out of 55 winning groups achieved the 2% benchmark. Yet, ALONA Party-list, with just 0.65% of the vote, still found its way into Congress. The 2019 elections echoed a similar trend — only eight of 51 winners surpassed 2%, and the Kabataan Party-list clinched a seat with a meager 0.7%.

Such numbers raise a fundamental question: Is the party-list system still working as intended?

The Cracks in the System

Originally designed to give voice to underrepresented groups — farmers, laborers, indigenous peoples, women, youth — the party-list system has increasingly been dominated by well-funded, politically-affiliated, and celebrity-backed organizations. Some critics argue that certain party-lists are mere extensions of powerful clans or traditional politicians in disguise.

The low threshold for representation, compounded by Comelec’s discretion to fill all party-list slots regardless of vote share, has opened the floodgates to groups with minimal public support. This dilution has serious implications. It marginalizes the marginalized, and shifts legislative power toward interest groups with more resources than relevance.

The Quiet Revolution: Who Deserves a Seat?

Among the six triumphant groups, several have been criticized for not being representative of the truly marginalized, while others are closely associated with national political figures and ruling alliances. For example, Duterte Youth, named after the former President, has faced intense scrutiny over its legitimacy as a youth representative. Meanwhile, ACT-CIS, reportedly backed by a well-known broadcast journalist’s family, continues to enjoy high visibility and electoral success.

And yet, groups like Kabataan or Gabriela, long-standing advocates for specific social sectors, often barely scrape by — if they make it at all.

Reform or Ruin?

Calls for party-list reform have grown louder with each election cycle. Proposals range from raising the threshold to ensure stronger public mandates, to stricter vetting of nominees, to revisiting the allocation formula that allows low-performing groups into Congress. But real change remains elusive.

The current trend, if left unchecked, risks turning the party-list system into a farce — a tool no longer of empowerment but of political maneuvering.

Final Word: Representation or Replication?

The House of Representatives is meant to be a mosaic of Filipino voices — rich and poor, rural and urban, mainstream and marginalized. But when those who barely register in the public's conscience gain a seat, and those with genuine grassroots support are drowned out by political machinery, democracy falters.

The 2% rule was supposed to separate the wheat from the chaff. But if Comelec continues to award congressional seats like participation trophies just to fill quotas, the party-list system becomes a hollow promise.

The nation deserves better. The people deserve true representation. And the system must rise to meet that expectation — or risk irrelevance.

Ross Flores Del Rosario is the founder of Wazzup Pilipinas, an online media platform dedicated to promoting transparency, good governance, and public awareness across all sectors of Philippine society.