Who Are Part of the Impeachment Court? Meet the 24 Senators Set to Judge Sara Duterte

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

In a moment that promises to be a political turning point in Philippine history, the Senate gears up to assume its solemn constitutional role as the impeachment court for Vice President Sara Duterte. Mark your calendars: July 21 is not just another day in politics—it is the day the nation holds its breath.

With the 2025 midterm elections concluded, the Philippine Senate is now composed of 24 seated members, each one carrying the enormous responsibility of serving as a judge in what could be one of the most controversial and consequential trials the country has witnessed in recent memory.

Below is the full roster of senators—both incumbents and newly elected—who will weigh the evidence, interpret the law, and ultimately decide the political fate of the second-highest official in the land.

Returning Powerhouses and Veteran Lawmakers

(Senators currently serving in office)

Alan Peter Cayetano

JV Ejercito

Chiz Escudero

Jinggoy Estrada

Win Gatchalian

Risa Hontiveros

Loren Legarda

Robin Padilla

Raffy Tulfo

Joel Villanueva

Mark Villar

Migz Zubiri

These are the seasoned political figures who have already proven themselves in legislative debates and committee investigations. But in an impeachment court, they are stripped of partisanship—they must judge based solely on the Constitution and evidence presented.

The New Senate-Elect Faces

(Newly elected senators set to assume office before the trial)

Bong Go

Bam Aquino

Ronald “Bato” Dela Rosa

Erwin Tulfo

Kiko Pangilinan

Rodante Marcoleta

Ping Lacson

Tito Sotto

Pia Cayetano

Camille Villar

Lito Lapid

Imee Marcos

These figures—some returning, some newcomers—represent a broad spectrum of ideologies and public personas. From hardline conservatives to centrist reformers, the diversity of this impeachment court could make or break the trial's impartiality and outcome.

The High-Stakes Political Climate

This trial is not just about Sara Duterte. It is about the integrity of democratic institutions and the rule of law in a polarized Philippines. With strong political dynasties, alliances, and rivalries all at play, every statement, every vote, and every procedural decision will be watched, analyzed, and remembered.

Will loyalty to party and personality overshadow justice? Or will this group of 24 rise above the noise and deliver a fair verdict based on truth?

What’s Next?

As the trial kicks off on July 21, expect high drama, fiery exchanges, and perhaps, a few unexpected twists. Constitutional experts, political analysts, and everyday Filipinos will be glued to the screens and updates. The senators, now transformed into judges, will have to walk a tightrope between political survival and national duty.

Whatever the outcome, history will remember how these 24 senators carried the weight of a nation's hope—and whether they chose the path of justice or politics.

Stay tuned. The courtroom is about to open, and the eyes of the Filipino people are watching.

Follow Wazzup Pilipinas for real-time updates, exclusive insights, and behind-the-scenes access to one of the most critical trials in recent Philippine history.

Power in the Margins: The 2% Rule and the Rise of the Few in the Party-list Race

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

In a nation where democracy is measured not just by voices but by representation, the party-list system was envisioned as a powerful equalizer — a mechanism meant to give marginalized sectors a seat at the legislative table. But in recent elections, the reality paints a dramatically different picture. Power remains concentrated, and the 2% threshold — once seen as a key that unlocks representation — has become more symbolic than decisive.

As the results of the latest elections unfold, only six party-list groups have managed to clear the coveted 2% vote share, guaranteeing them one seat each in the House of Representatives. These groups are:

Akbayan Citizens’ Action Party (AKBAYAN)

Duterte Youth Party-List (DUTERTE YOUTH)

Tingog Sinirangan (TINGOG)

Pagtibayin at Palaguin ang Pangkabuhayang Pilipino (4PS)

Anti-Crime and Terrorism-Community Involvement and Support, Inc. (ACT-CIS)

Ako Bicol Political Party (AKO BIKOL)

These six parties are now poised to wield substantial influence, particularly the top-performing among them who may receive up to three seats, the constitutional cap for party-list representation per group. But beyond this elite circle lies a striking democratic dilemma — the remaining seats in the 20% party-list allocation of the House will be filled by groups that didn’t even reach the 2% mark.

The Numbers Behind the Power

The 2% vote share rule is not just a benchmark — it’s a promise. A promise that those who genuinely command public support earn their rightful place in Congress. But what happens when that threshold is met by only a few? The Commission on Elections (Comelec) is then forced to allocate seats to lower-performing groups just to complete the constitutionally mandated 20% party-list representation.

This is not a fluke. It’s a pattern.

In the 2022 elections, only six out of 55 winning groups achieved the 2% benchmark. Yet, ALONA Party-list, with just 0.65% of the vote, still found its way into Congress. The 2019 elections echoed a similar trend — only eight of 51 winners surpassed 2%, and the Kabataan Party-list clinched a seat with a meager 0.7%.

Such numbers raise a fundamental question: Is the party-list system still working as intended?

The Cracks in the System

Originally designed to give voice to underrepresented groups — farmers, laborers, indigenous peoples, women, youth — the party-list system has increasingly been dominated by well-funded, politically-affiliated, and celebrity-backed organizations. Some critics argue that certain party-lists are mere extensions of powerful clans or traditional politicians in disguise.

The low threshold for representation, compounded by Comelec’s discretion to fill all party-list slots regardless of vote share, has opened the floodgates to groups with minimal public support. This dilution has serious implications. It marginalizes the marginalized, and shifts legislative power toward interest groups with more resources than relevance.

The Quiet Revolution: Who Deserves a Seat?

Among the six triumphant groups, several have been criticized for not being representative of the truly marginalized, while others are closely associated with national political figures and ruling alliances. For example, Duterte Youth, named after the former President, has faced intense scrutiny over its legitimacy as a youth representative. Meanwhile, ACT-CIS, reportedly backed by a well-known broadcast journalist’s family, continues to enjoy high visibility and electoral success.

And yet, groups like Kabataan or Gabriela, long-standing advocates for specific social sectors, often barely scrape by — if they make it at all.

Reform or Ruin?

Calls for party-list reform have grown louder with each election cycle. Proposals range from raising the threshold to ensure stronger public mandates, to stricter vetting of nominees, to revisiting the allocation formula that allows low-performing groups into Congress. But real change remains elusive.

The current trend, if left unchecked, risks turning the party-list system into a farce — a tool no longer of empowerment but of political maneuvering.

Final Word: Representation or Replication?

The House of Representatives is meant to be a mosaic of Filipino voices — rich and poor, rural and urban, mainstream and marginalized. But when those who barely register in the public's conscience gain a seat, and those with genuine grassroots support are drowned out by political machinery, democracy falters.

The 2% rule was supposed to separate the wheat from the chaff. But if Comelec continues to award congressional seats like participation trophies just to fill quotas, the party-list system becomes a hollow promise.

The nation deserves better. The people deserve true representation. And the system must rise to meet that expectation — or risk irrelevance.

Ross Flores Del Rosario is the founder of Wazzup Pilipinas, an online media platform dedicated to promoting transparency, good governance, and public awareness across all sectors of Philippine society.

Dynasty Over Democracy: The Recto Victory in Batangas Sparks Outrage Over Political Entitlement

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

As the election dust settles in Batangas, a troubling narrative once again emerges from the ruins of what many hoped would be a more democratic and merit-based political race. The victory of Vilma Santos-Recto and her son Ryan Christian Recto—coupled with the electoral loss of her other son, Luis "Lucky" Manzano—is more than just a familial headline. It’s a resounding slap to the face of delicadeza, propriety, and the very spirit of our Constitution’s anti-dynasty principle.

Three members of the same family dared to run for the three most influential positions in Batangas: Governor, Vice Governor, and Congressman. Let that sink in. Not one, not two—but three. The blatant audacity of it leaves many Filipinos reeling in frustration, disbelief, and righteous anger.

This is not just a story of politics; this is a story of how the noble calling of public service has been disfigured into a family business—where surnames, not service, determine leadership. And perhaps the most gut-wrenching part? The meekest candidate won.

Ryan Christian Recto, a name barely heard in legislative discourse or policy debates, now sits in Congress. While the other candidates struggled to articulate platforms and defend advocacies, he rode the wave of family fame, his victory propelled not by merit, but by surname. A young man with barely any public service track record was pitted against a seasoned lawyer, and still came out on top. The lawyer didn't just lose—he finished a distant third.

Let that detail simmer: A qualified lawyer—someone with the legal acumen to craft laws and uphold justice—was outvoted by someone whose main political asset appears to be his family tree.

This isn’t an isolated tragedy; it’s part of a systemic plague. Look no further than the current Senate. We have:

Two Estradas

Two Villars

Two Tulfos

Two Cayetanos

Are we truly a nation of 110 million people so bereft of talent, so lacking in passionate and capable public servants, that we must constantly recycle the same last names? Or have we simply grown accustomed to the reality that dynasties rule, and we, the electorate, have surrendered the fight?

It’s time we face a hard truth: political dynasties are no longer subtle; they are aggressively entrenching themselves—boldly, unapologetically, and often with devastating consequences to governance.

Our Constitution, in Article II, Section 26, clearly states:

"The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service, and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law."

Yet for decades, this provision has remained a toothless tiger—strong in principle but feeble in enforcement, because the very people who benefit from dynasties are the ones who refuse to define and legislate their limits.

Public office is not a birthright. It is not a trophy to pass down from parent to child. It is a sacred trust from the people—a duty, a responsibility. It demands experience, integrity, and vision—not a familiar surname and a famous face.

As we approach future elections, this must be our rallying cry: Enough is enough.

Let us demand laws that enforce anti-dynasty provisions with sharp teeth. Let us demand political parties to choose based on capability, not connections. Let us support candidates who have worked from the ground up, who know the struggle of ordinary citizens, and who do not rely on legacy but on service.

And most importantly, let us awaken the electorate—to vote not out of nostalgia or name recall, but with critical thinking, conscience, and hope.

The win of the Rectos in Batangas may have been legal, but it was far from moral. It’s time to stop mistaking popularity for qualification, and to stop letting politics become a family heirloom.

Because democracy dies when dynasties thrive.

Ross Flores Del Rosario is the founder of Wazzup Pilipinas, an advocate for good governance, and a strong voice for transparency, accountability, and genuine public service.