BREAKING

Sunday, March 23, 2025

Rodrigo Duterte’s Legacy: A Chronicle of Choices and Consequences


Wazzup Pilipinas!?



History is often kind to those who wield power with wisdom and restraint. But for former President Rodrigo Duterte, the ledger of his rule is stained with choices that left an indelible mark on the Philippines—choices that could have been different, choices that didn’t have to be made.


The Path He Didn't Have to Take

Duterte didn’t have to turn the war on drugs into a bloodbath of extrajudicial killings, where the streets became morgues and justice was reduced to the barrel of a gun. He didn’t have to hoard billions in confidential funds, operating under a shroud of secrecy while the nation’s poor struggled for survival. He didn’t have to leave Marawi in ruins, a ghost city that still echoes with the cries of its displaced citizens. He didn’t have to gamble away Philippine sovereignty, allowing China’s shadow to stretch ominously over our seas and territories.


But he did. Again and again.


At every crossroads, he chose brutality over justice, power over principle, impunity over accountability. And those who stood by, those who clapped and cheered as he spat out profanities, mocked women, and called for the deaths of addicts and clergy alike—are they not complicit? Are they not stained by silence?


The Economy He Inherited—And Squandered

Duterte entered MalacaƱang with the strongest economy the country had seen in decades. He had what his predecessor, Benigno Aquino III, lacked: a deep connection with the people. He had the charisma, the populist appeal, the trust of the masses. All he had to do was sustain the economic trajectory and ensure that prosperity trickled down to those who needed it most.


Instead, he let it wither.


The economy became an afterthought to his strongman posturing. The institutions meant to safeguard democracy crumbled under his watch. Checks and balances became casualties of his war on dissent. Media organizations were shut down. Critics were jailed. The Supreme Court, Congress, even the police and military—once independent bodies—became mere instruments of his will.

He was Trump 2.0 before Trump himself had fully unraveled. A populist whose greatest skill was manipulating emotions, turning fear into fuel for control.


The Making of a Dictator

A person isn’t born a tyrant; they become one through the choices they make. But perhaps, long before Duterte held the highest office in the land, his path had already been laid.

What shaped his callousness? Was it childhood trauma? Was it a life marked by abuse, neglect, or unchecked rage? Did his experiences mold a leader who saw strength only in dominance, who viewed compassion as weakness?

Understanding his past does not excuse his actions, but it may explain them. His presidency was a reflection of a man who saw the world in absolutes—loyalty or betrayal, submission or defiance, friend or enemy. And those who fed his delusions of grandeur, those who indulged his every whim, bear the weight of his sins as well.


And So Here We Are

The Duterte era is over, but its scars remain. Marawi still waits for true rehabilitation. The families of the drug war victims still cry for justice. The institutions he dismantled still struggle to rebuild.


And there he is—at The Hague.


History has a way of catching up, of demanding answers, of weighing actions against justice. For Duterte and those who stood by as he committed his greatest sins, reckoning has begun.

Not all battles are fought in the streets. Some are fought in the courtrooms of history. And in that trial, the verdict is being written—not just for Duterte, but for a nation that must decide whether to let darkness define its future or to finally choose a different path.


*Image from Nikkei Asia

Cracking Down on Fake News: House Tri Comm Holds Vloggers Accountable in Landmark Hearing


Wazzup Pilipinas!?



The House of Representatives’ Tri-Committee—composed of the Committees on Public Order and Safety, Public Information, and Information and Communications Technology—reconvened on Friday, March 21, to address one of the most pressing issues of the digital age: the rampant spread of fake news and disinformation on social media.

This time, the hearing took on an even more dramatic turn as high-profile social media influencers and vloggers—who had previously refused to attend—were finally compelled to face the inquiry.


A Day of Reckoning

For months, vloggers and influencers accused of spreading false and misleading content evaded the congressional investigation, opting instead to challenge the legality of the probe before the Supreme Court. Their legal maneuvering, however, failed to halt the proceedings, as the High Court declined to issue a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that would have stopped the House committees from moving forward.

Among those who finally appeared at the hearing were Atty. Trixie Cruz-Angeles, Krizette Laureta Chu, Mary Jean Quiambao Reyes, Elizabeth Joie Cruz, Ethel Pineda Garcia, Aeron PeƱa, Ahmed Paglinawan, and Mark Anthony Lopez—names widely recognized in the online sphere for their strong political commentaries and viral content.

In a stunning moment, vloggers Chu, Reyes, and Lopez took the floor to issue public apologies for their past misleading social media posts—an acknowledgment that signaled the growing recognition of accountability in the digital space.


A Broader Fight Against Misinformation

The congressional probe was not just about holding influencers accountable—it was also a strategic move to rein in the unchecked spread of fake news that has manipulated public perception, swayed political narratives, and even incited real-world consequences.

The hearing was attended by key figures from law enforcement, media, and regulatory agencies, underscoring the seriousness of the issue. Present were:


PNP-CIDG chief PMGen. Nicolas Torre III

Philippine Coast Guard Commodore Jay Tarriela

Presidential Communications Office (PCO) Secretary Jay Ruiz

PCO Undersecretary Claire Castro

TikTok/ByteDance Philippines Public Policy Manager Peachy Paderna

Officials from the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), the Philippine National Police (PNP), the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), and the Department of Justice (DOJ)

Representatives from the Kapisanan ng mga Brodkaster ng Pilipinas (KBP) and independent media organizations

Their participation signified a united front against the proliferation of disinformation, with social media platforms themselves now under scrutiny for their role in enabling the spread of fake content.


The Digital Battleground: Free Speech vs. Responsibility

While the hearing highlighted the dangers of fake news, it also brought forth a heated debate on free speech and the boundaries of government regulation. The influencers who had initially resisted attending the probe argued that the congressional inquiry infringed upon their constitutional rights. Yet, the absence of a Supreme Court intervention to stop the hearings reinforced the government's authority to investigate content that may harm public welfare.

With social media now serving as a powerful tool for shaping public opinion, lawmakers face the challenge of balancing digital freedom with the need for responsible online behavior. Should influencers be held to the same standards as traditional journalists? Should social media platforms be more aggressive in curbing misleading content? These are just some of the questions that linger as the inquiry continues.


What Comes Next?

The House Tri Comm’s crackdown on fake news is far from over. Lawmakers are expected to draft measures that will introduce stricter guidelines for social media accountability, possibly involving financial penalties, regulatory oversight, or even criminal liability for persistent offenders.

Meanwhile, the apology from some vloggers marks a turning point—an implicit admission that misinformation has consequences. Whether this moment leads to genuine reform or simply a temporary retreat remains to be seen.

One thing is clear: the fight against fake news has entered a new phase, and the digital landscape in the Philippines may never be the same again.

The Battle of Narratives: Why the War on Drugs Still Holds Power in the Filipino Psyche


Wazzup Pilipinas!?



Why hasn’t the issue of extrajudicial killings (EJKs) in the War on Drugs, Crime, and Corruption gained enough negative traction to bring down those who led it?


Look at the bigger picture.


The War on Drugs wasn’t just a policy—it was a story. A story that framed itself as the ultimate solution to the problem of peace and order. And when people believe they’ve found a solution, why would they reject it?


To win the war of public opinion, those who oppose Duterte’s legacy—whether from the BBM camp or the Pinks—must first dismantle this narrative. They must remove "peace and order" as the defining issue. Because if that issue remains central, then the War on Drugs will always be seen as its champion, and Duterte as its hero.


But here’s the real question: Has peace and order improved during Duterte's administration or has it worsened when he left office?


If the answer is yes, that it has improved during his time—and that it was achieved by the War on Drugs—then the story or narrative that rooted proved that safety and stability were possible because of the bloodshed.


But if the answer is no to when a new president was seated, that things have now gotten worse, then the War on Drugs doesn’t just remain relevant—it grows stronger. It transforms into proof that Duterte’s methods worked, reinforcing his image as the fearless warrior who tamed chaos.


The battle of narratives is unfolding before our eyes. Just pay attention to the framing: If ______ is the problem, then ________ is the solution.


And here’s why the ICC case against Duterte struggles to gain ground among some Filipinos especially the OFWs: If Filipinos still see him as the gladiator who fought for their safety, then surrendering him to an international court becomes the problem. That’s why the slogan hit home: #BringHimHome!


Many political campaigns forget a fundamental truth: All wars are story wars. The strategy isn’t just about policies, investigations, or legal action. It’s about who tells the better story. And in this battlefield of narratives, the one who controls the story controls the outcome.


The tear-jerking promotional campaign videos of popular brands show that the creators of these "commercials" also know how to touch the heart of Filipinos regardless if they're too gullible or disinformed.


*Photo from The Guardian 

Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas Wazzup Pilipinas and the Umalohokans. Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas celebrating 10th year of online presence
 
Copyright © 2013 Wazzup Pilipinas News and Events
Design by FBTemplates | BTT