BREAKING

Tuesday, January 21, 2025

Donald Trump Declares: Only Two Genders Recognized by U.S. Federal Government


Wazzup Pilipinas!?



An Executive Order Sparking Controversy and Conversations Worldwide


In a move that has reignited one of the most divisive debates of the 21st century, the newly inaugurated 47th U.S. President Donald Trump announced plans to sign an executive order limiting federal recognition of genders to just two: male and female. This declaration has sparked both praise and condemnation across various sectors, from religious organizations and political groups to LGBTQ+ advocates and social scientists.


The Executive Order: A Return to “Reality”?

President Trump’s announcement comes amidst a growing pushback from conservative groups against what they perceive as an overly complex and increasingly fluid interpretation of gender. Declaring that the federal government will "officially recognize just male and female genders," Trump stated, “Biologically, it’s time to align with the truth. We are male and female, and that’s how it was intended.”


Supporters Rally Behind the Move

Trump’s declaration has been met with overwhelming support from conservative and religious communities who argue that science and biblical teachings align on the matter. Many have cited Genesis 5:2: “He created them male and female. When they were created, He blessed them and called them mankind.” Supporters praise the order as a stand against what they view as the erosion of traditional values and the rise of "confusion" surrounding gender identities.


“That’s Biblically and Constitutionally correct! No more, no less!” shared one supporter.

“It’s about time someone restored clarity to something so fundamental,” said another.

The order has also been lauded as a stance against the perceived "sexual immorality" in modern culture, with some claiming it will protect the younger generation from "corrupted ideologies."


Criticism and Concern from Advocacy Groups

Conversely, the move has sparked outrage among LGBTQ+ organizations, human rights activists, and social progressives. Critics argue that the executive order erases the identities and experiences of millions of people who do not conform to the binary understanding of gender. Gender identity, as distinct from biological sex, has long been recognized by leading psychological and medical associations as a spectrum, not a dichotomy.


“What happens to non-binary, intersex, and transgender individuals? This order doesn’t just invalidate their identities—it endangers their rights, healthcare access, and safety,” said a spokesperson for the Human Rights Campaign.


Advocates point to the scientific community, which recognizes that intersex conditions occur naturally in approximately 1 in 2,000 births. Others highlight that gender identity and expression are deeply personal and cultural, shaped by more than just chromosomes or anatomy.


A Global Perspective: Implications Beyond the U.S.

The executive order is likely to have ripple effects far beyond U.S. borders. In countries like the Philippines, where conversations around LGBTQ+ rights are ongoing, debates over gender identity have gained traction. Social media lit up with mixed reactions:


“Dalawang kasarian lamang base sa science at higit sa lahat base sa biblia. Hindi dapat gawing komplikado.”

“Ang sexuality ay dalawa lang talaga, male at female, pero gender identity? Iba yan. Nasa tao kung ano siya: girl, boy, bakla, o tomboy.”

In more progressive nations, this move may further isolate the U.S. from global discussions on gender inclusivity. The United Nations and many other international organizations have recognized the importance of protecting non-binary and transgender individuals’ rights, with some countries legally recognizing a third gender.


What’s Next?

President Trump’s executive order is expected to face significant legal challenges. LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have already announced plans to take the matter to court, arguing that the order violates constitutional protections of equal rights and freedom of expression.


For millions of Americans—and people worldwide—this debate is far from over. The decision will shape not only the trajectory of gender rights in the U.S. but also how societies globally grapple with the evolving understanding of identity, science, and culture.


As this controversial policy unfolds, one question looms large: How do societies balance respect for traditional values with the rights and recognition of diverse identities?

UP Circuit Powers Up 27th SquEEEze: Uniting EEE’s Brightest Minds


Wazzup Pilipinas!?


UP Circuit is back launching again one of its most anticipated flagship events called 𝐒𝐪𝐮𝐄𝐄𝐄𝐳𝐞:𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐄𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐄𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐬 (𝐄𝐄𝐄) 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, now on its 27th iteration. This January 2025, the event awaits students and professionals to gather and celebrate excellence and expertise in this field of engineering.

SquEEEze is a major event for the EEE community organized annually by UP Circuit, an academic organization based on the Electrical and Electronics Engineering Institute (EEEI) ofbthe University of the Philippines Diliman (UPD) aiming to unite the brightest young minds for a chance to unleash their utmost potential.

Three events will be featured this year, all presented in a face-to-face setup:

𝐴𝑚𝑝 𝑈𝑝 𝑌𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝐺𝑎𝑚𝑒! The 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫-𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐒𝐜𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐥 𝐐𝐮𝐢𝐳 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐰 on 𝑱𝒂𝒏𝒖𝒂𝒓𝒚 25 invites high school students nationwide to test their knowledge in fundamental EEE topics. Alongside the competition, participants will gain insights into the basics of EEE through engaging talks and hands-on workshops, offering them a glimpse into the possibilities that lie ahead in this field.

𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡'𝑠 𝑌𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑊𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐴𝑛𝑠𝑤𝑒𝑟? The 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫-𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐞 𝐐𝐮𝐢𝐳 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐰 on 𝑭𝒆𝒃𝒓𝒖𝒂𝒓𝒚 1 brings together teams from the country’s top universities to compete in an intense battle of wits and teamwork. It’s a platform for Electrical, Electronics, and Computer Engineering students to demonstrate their expertise and deepen their understanding of the discipline through insightful discussions.

𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑐𝑘 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑊𝑜𝑟𝑙𝑑 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝐼𝑛𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛! The 𝐓𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭 (𝐓𝐞𝐜𝐡 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧) on 𝑭𝒆𝒃𝒓𝒖𝒂𝒓𝒚 1 presents an avenue for college undergraduates taking a program among BS Electronics

Engineering (BS ECE), BS Electrical Engineering (BS EE) and BS Computer Engineering (BS CoE) as well to propose innovative solutions grounded in EEE concepts to pressing real-world challenges with the theme "𝐁𝐞𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐝 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞: 𝐋𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐒𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐒𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐞".

Don’t resist your excitement and join now! Stay updated by following the official SquEEEze Facebook page for more details and exclusive offers on registration and event guidelines.

Monday, January 20, 2025

The Curious Case of COMELEC vs. Edgar Erice: A Litmus Test for Electoral Credibility


Wazzup Pilipinas!?



As the Philippines gears up for the 2025 elections, the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) finds itself embroiled in controversies that question its credibility and fairness. From procedural blunders to high-profile disqualifications, the institution’s decisions are under intense scrutiny. Among the most contentious issues is the disqualification of former Congressman Edgar Erice—a case that not only highlights alleged lapses in judgment but also raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and electoral transparency.


The Ballot Printing Fiasco

At the heart of the controversy is COMELEC’s decision to disqualify several candidates, including Erice. This disqualification led to the initial printing of six million ballots, which were later deemed invalid due to incomplete or incorrect candidate names. COMELEC Chair George Garcia admitted that these ballots would have to be destroyed, wasting millions of pesos in taxpayer money. The Election Management System (EMS) also requires a complete reset to update the candidate database—a costly and time-consuming process that further delays election preparations.


Such procedural errors have fueled criticism about COMELEC’s efficiency and capacity to manage a fair election process.


Edgar Erice’s Disqualification: A Question of Integrity

The disqualification of Edgar Erice is particularly controversial. COMELEC invoked Section 261 (z)(11) of the Omnibus Election Code, which prohibits the dissemination of false and alarming information intended to disrupt elections. Erice’s supposed offense? Raising questions about COMELEC’s actions, including:


The Disqualification of Smartmatic: The Supreme Court itself found COMELEC’s disqualification of the bidding company tainted with grave abuse of discretion.

The Use of Untested Prototypes: Erice questioned the legality of using prototype voting machines, arguing it violates election laws.

The ₱18-Billion Automated Elections Contract: The awarding of this massive contract to Miru Systems was flagged due to the involvement of St. Timothy, a company allegedly linked to local political figures running in Pasig against Mayor Vico Sotto.

Despite Erice’s valid concerns, COMELEC labeled his criticisms as false and disruptive, which he and his supporters argue undermines his right to demand transparency and accountability.


The Elephant in the Room: Conflict of Interest

Further complicating the issue is the alleged conflict of interest within COMELEC itself. George Garcia, COMELEC Chair, was the former election lawyer of Mitch Cajayon-Uy, Erice’s opponent for Congress. This connection casts doubt on the impartiality of the decision to disqualify Erice and raises questions about fairness in the electoral process.


Implications for the 2025 Elections

The stakes are high. If the Supreme Court does not decisively address Erice’s disqualification and the broader allegations surrounding COMELEC’s decisions, the credibility of the 2025 elections could be at risk. The unresolved issues include:


The legality of Miru Systems’ involvement and its local partners.

Allegations by Mayor Vico Sotto regarding St. Timothy’s political ties.

The misuse of funds in printing invalid ballots.

These issues could erode public trust and fuel further political unrest.


A Call for Fairness and Transparency

The disqualification of critics like Erice sets a dangerous precedent. Legitimate questions about electoral integrity should not be silenced under the guise of maintaining order. Instead, they should serve as an impetus for reform and transparency.


With just months before the elections, COMELEC must act decisively to restore public confidence. Addressing Erice’s allegations, ensuring impartiality in decision-making, and improving operational efficiency are critical steps. The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling on Erice’s case will likely be a defining moment, not just for the former congressman but for the integrity of the Philippine electoral system as a whole.


May fairness prevail, and may the voice of the Filipino people be heard loud and clear in the 2025 elections.

Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas Wazzup Pilipinas and the Umalohokans. Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas celebrating 10th year of online presence
 
Copyright © 2013 Wazzup Pilipinas News and Events
Design by FBTemplates | BTT