BREAKING

Saturday, November 15, 2025

The Reckoning: Why the Global South Must Be the Engine of Climate Survival


Wazzup Pilipinas!? 



The age of climate apathy is over. As powerful typhoons, historic droughts, and rising seas reshape the world, the Global South stands on the precipice—a fragile front line demanding justice, capital, and the right to forge its own green future. The skepticism of any single superpower is now utterly irrelevant to the survival of the planet.


The planet’s thermostat is broken. Every new cataclysm—from the merciless storms that savage tropical archipelagos to the slow, suffocating crawl of desertification—is a stark and dramatic reminder: climate change is not a future threat, it is a present reality.


And while one of the world’s most powerful economies, under a renewed administration, embraces a stance of skepticism and hostility, that political retreat does absolutely nothing to alter the brutal facts on the ground. For the vast majority of the world—the populous, predominantly tropical nations of the Global South—this crisis is a matter of life, death, and immediate necessity.


This is the central tension heading into critical global dialogues like COP30: the front-line victims of the crisis are demanding a total systemic overhaul from the historic architects of the problem.


The Four Pillars of Climate Justice

The perennial demands of the Global South, forged in the crucible of escalating disaster, are a non-negotiable manifesto for the developed world. They are the essential terms for victory in the war against climate collapse.


1. Flexibility Over Fixity: A Call to Heed Local Wisdom

The Global North must abandon its rigid, one-size-fits-all prescriptions for environmental action. Developed nations must genuinely listen to the lived experience of developing and least developed countries. A dogmatic approach to technology, energy transition, and conservation frustrates the sincere, proactive measures many nations are already taking.


To win this fight, the North must provide flexibility. This is not a bid to evade responsibility, but a recognition that effective, scalable solutions must be locally resonant. Furthermore, the defense of a sustainable environment is fundamentally a human right, intrinsically linked to dignity and security. The international silence surrounding devastating acts of ecocide in conflict zones only compounds this injustice, underscoring the deep hypocrisy when human rights are selectively applied.


2. The Capital Crisis: Fulfilling the Financial Debt

Money talks. The failure to fulfill climate finance commitments for vulnerable nations is the ultimate act of bad faith. It is not charity being requested, but the timely repayment of a debt—a climate reparation owed to tropical countries for centuries of unchecked global emissions.


The figures are staggering, demanding a dramatic surge in funding: developing nations are projected to need $1.1 trillion in climate finance by 2025 and a monumental $1.8 trillion by 2030. This financial necessity forces a critical shift: climate action can no longer be about setting ambitious targets; the time has come for adaptation implementation and hard delivery.


The Tropical Uprising: Leading Without the North

The retreat of any single superpower, while significant, is not a signal to surrender; it is a profound opportunity to strengthen multilateral cooperation and for the Global South to assert its own, powerful leadership. The world can and must act regardless of the largest economy’s involvement.


The most compelling proof of this paradigm shift is the development of innovative, self-led initiatives, such as the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF). This initiative, championed by nations with the most precious ecological assets, aims to secure a massive fund to support lasting conservation and protect crucial tropical ecosystems.


Endorsed by a majority of the world's tropical forest countries—those stewarding over 90 percent of this critical global resource—the TFFF demonstrates the potent capacity of the Global South to build its own solutions to existential challenges. This is a framework for equitable, transparent conservation, ensuring that the burden of protecting irreplaceable biodiversity does not come at the cost of basic human needs, such as education, jobs, or dignity. The North has a moral obligation to support, rather than dictate, these efforts.


The Imperative for Regional Blocs

The challenge now turns inward. Regional blocs in the Global South cannot shirk their own responsibilities.


While these blocs often have a proud history of geopolitical neutrality and advancing economic integration, that same fierce urgency must now be applied to climate leadership. Praiseworthy declarations and action plans are only the starting point. Without bold, decisive action, words remain hollow, and regional bodies risk vulnerability to accusations of pandering to denialism even as their own people suffer mounting climate disasters.


The mandate for all regional groupings—from Southeast Asia to Africa to Latin America—is clear:


Stop setting the floor and start setting the pace.


Translate declarations into immediate, funded implementation.


Harness credibility and influence to connect disparate blocs—from China and the BRICS coalition to the EU and GCC—and forge a powerful, unified front for multilateral action.


The ultimate conclusion is both dramatic and hopeful: The fight against climate change is far from over. It is still possible for both the developed and the developing worlds to win this battle. But the victory will be secured on the terms of the Global South, built on a foundation of climate justice, unprecedented financial commitment, and decisive, self-determined action.

Red Carpet for Polluters: Fossil Fuel Lobbyists Flood COP30, Dwarfing Climate-Vulnerable Nations' Voices


Wazzup Pilipinas!? 



BELEM, BRAZIL — November 14, 2025.


The promise of COP30 in Belém, Brazil, as a critical "Implementation COP" for the Paris Agreement, has been profoundly overshadowed by a shocking revelation: the fossil fuel industry has achieved its largest-ever share of attendance at a UN climate summit. New analysis from the Kick Big Polluters Out (KBPO) coalition reveals that the industry’s presence is not just large—it’s an overwhelming display of corporate influence that actively threatens the talks' stated goals.


The Numbers Tell a Grim Story

According to KBPO's analysis, more than 1,600 fossil fuel lobbyists have been granted access to the COP30 negotiations. This colossal figure means that approximately one in every 25 participants in Belém represents the fossil fuel industry.


This overwhelming presence marks a 12% increase in the proportional share of lobbyists since last year's COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan. The sheer volume of industry representatives is staggering, with the lobbyist count significantly outnumbering almost every country delegation at COP30 —only host country Brazil sent more people.


But perhaps the most damning comparison is the disparity between the polluters and those on the frontlines of the climate crisis:


Fossil fuel lobbyists have received two-thirds more passes to COP30 than all the delegates from the 10 most climate-vulnerable nations combined (1,061 delegates).


The lobbyists outnumber official delegates from the Philippines by nearly 50 to 1—even as that country is battered by devastating typhoons.


They sent more than 40 times the number of people than Jamaica, a nation still reeling from Hurricane Melissa.


Corporate Capture: An Inside Job

The KBPO analysis highlights that this influence is being wielded from the inside. Major trade associations remain a primary vehicle for influence, with the International Emissions Trading Association bringing 60 representatives, including delegates from oil and gas giants ExxonMobil, BP, and TotalEnergies.


Crucially, fossil fuel delegates are also gaining critical, behind-the-scenes access through official country badges. Several Global North nations have included fossil fuel representatives within their official delegations:



France brought 22 fossil fuel delegates, including five from TotalEnergies, one of whom is CEO Patrick Pouyanné.



Japan’s delegation contained 33 fossil fuel lobbyists, with representation from companies like Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Osaka Gas.



Norway included 17 representatives, including six senior executives from its national oil and gas giant, Equinor.


This research shows that at least 164 fossil fuel lobbyists are gaining access through these government badges —a concerning oversight, given that disclosure rules for funding and objectives at COP30 do not apply to those on government badges.


A Mockery of the Process

The coalition’s findings arrive as 2025 is projected to become one of the hottest years on record , and amidst a flurry of fossil fuel expansion, with nearly $250 billion approved for new oil and gas projects since COP29.


"It's common sense that you cannot solve a problem by giving power to those who caused it," said Jax Bonbon from IBON International in the Philippines, a KBPO member. "It is infuriating to watch their influence deepen year after year, making a mockery of the process and of the communities suffering its consequences".


Members of the coalition argue that the continued presence of Big Polluters only serves to push "false 'solutions' that sustain their profit motives and undermine any hope of truly addressing the climate emergency".


The Urgent Call: Kick Big Polluters Out

With the fossil fuel industry "dwarfing the climate finance countries are scrambling to agree on" and its lobbyists given "front row seats to decide our very future" , the call from civil society for clear conflict of interest policies and accountability measures has never been louder.


"As long as Big Polluters are allowed inside these talks... real solutions will remain out of reach," stated Nathan Stewart, Coordinator for Fossil Free Politics.


The coalition, representing more than 450 organizations globally , demands an end to the corporate capture of the climate talks, insisting that the only way to achieve real climate justice and a livable future is to Kick Big Polluters Out of the UNFCCC process now.

Friday, November 14, 2025

PARE calls on NGCP to strengthen Grid


Photo from Canva

Group notes that damaged transmission lines caused province-wide blackouts following typhoons

November 14, 2025 – The Partners for Affordable and Reliable Energy (PARE) has called on the National Grid Corporation of the Philippines (NGCP) to shape up and improve its transmission facilities after its fallen lines and towers were the cause of massive blackouts in areas affected by recent typhoons. 


"When Typhoon Uwan struck, NGCP reported that thirty-six transmission lines in Luzon and Visayas became unavailable, instantly taking entire provinces offline. While local electric cooperatives raced to explain and restore neighborhood-level connections, most brownouts were triggered not by the cooperatives but by damaged NGCP lines. Yet the burden and customer anger fell on the electric cooperatives, creating confusion and a misplaced sense of frustration," Nic Satur Jr., Chief Advocate Officer of PARE, said in a statement on November 13, 2025. 


NGCP is responsible for operating, maintaining, and developing the country’s critical transmission backbone. Yet progress has been slow, with repeated project delays and unfinished projects, often attributed to right-of-way issues, regulatory hurdles, or procurement problems.


"Numerous vital projects, such as new substations and extra-high-voltage transmission lines in Luzon, Cebu, the Visayas, and Mindanao, remain incomplete, exposing communities to heightened outage risks whenever a storm hits," Satur said.


In the Transmission Development Plan 2025 to 2050, NGCP promises to invest over P1 trillion over the next fifteen years.


"But recent disasters show that these projects urgently need fast-tracking and public accountability, not just long-term visions and paperwork," Satur said. 


PARE notes that amid project delays, NGCP has raised its transmission charges, which are passed on to consumers.


"This November, transmission rates saw a sharp increase of almost 8 percent, with average rates reaching P1 and P0.50 per kilowatt-hour, and ancillary services rates climbing by over 15 percent compared to the previous month," Satur said. 


However, Satur said that for consumers, the result is higher monthly bills, without assurance of grid reliability or faster power restoration in the next calamity.​


"PARE urges NGCP to honor every commitment. The corporation must urgently complete critical substations, backbone transmission lines, and modern grid management systems before the next typhoon, earthquake, or extreme weather disaster," Satur said.


He said NGCP is accountable to the public for every peso charged and every day of project delay. 


PARE called on the Energy Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy to strengthen its oversight to ensure that cost increases translate into genuinely improved service and disaster resilience, not just upward adjustments in monthly bills.​


"PARE has appealed for climate-proofing our sector for years. The Philippines is always at risk of typhoons and disasters, yet major power companies and regulatory agencies continue to invest reactively rather than proactively," Satur said.


He added that before the next super typhoon or major earthquake arrives, the sector must prioritize modernization, bury transmission lines in critical areas, and develop coordinated, disaster-proofing strategies.


"The time is now for NGCP to step up. Fast, transparent grid upgrades will save lives, reduce economic losses, and secure the affordable, reliable power every Filipino deserves," Satur said.


###


Thursday, November 13, 2025

Clean Energy Triumphs: World Reaches a Historic Climate Turning Point as Fossil Fuel Growth Halts in 2025 00


Wazzup Pilipinas!? 



The world has reached a monumental milestone in the clean energy transition: for the first time since the COVID-19 pandemic, no growth in fossil fuel generation is expected for the full year of 2025. This historic turning point is driven entirely by the explosive growth of clean power, which grew fast enough to meet—and even exceed—the world's rising electricity demand in the first three quarters of the year.


According to a new analysis by energy think tank Ember, detailed in its Q3 Global Power Report, this milestone is set to occur even as global electricity demand is projected to see a substantial increase—the sixth largest absolute increase on record at 831 TWh. The link between rising demand and rising fossil generation is finally being severed.


Solar and Wind Exceed All New Demand

The dramatic shift is thanks to record-breaking growth in solar power, combined with a moderate increase in wind generation.



Solar generation rose by an unprecedented 498 TWh (+31%) in the first three quarters of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, the largest increase ever over a nine-month period. This massive surge means solar output in Q1-Q3 2025 has already surpassed its total output for all of 2024.



Wind generation added an additional 137 TWh (+7.6%).


The combined growth from solar and wind was 635 TWh, which successfully outpaced the global rise in electricity demand of 603 TWh (+2.7%) for the first three quarters of 2025.


Despite a fall in hydropower generation of -54 TWh and a minor increase in nuclear generation (+33 TWh) , the rapid deployment of clean power was enough to keep fossil generation flat, resulting in a minor fall of -17 TWh (-0.1%) in the first three quarters of 2025.


"Record solar power growth and stagnating fossil fuels in 2025 show how clean power has become the driving force in the power sector," stated Nicolas Fulghum, Senior Data Analyst at Ember. "Historically a growth segment, fossil power now appears to be entering a period of stagnation and managed decline".


The Global Balance Tips: China and India Lead the Decline

The global stagnation of fossil fuels was tipped into reality by significant declines in China and India, which managed to balance out smaller fossil increases in the EU and US.


Country Change in Fossil Generation (Q1-Q3 2025 vs. 2024) Key Driver of Change

China

-52 TWh (-1.1%) 


Structural decline; fast-growing renewables (including a 44% year-on-year solar growth) met all new demand.


India

-34 TWh (-3.3%) 


Temporary decline; record solar and wind growth combined with unusually mild weather conditions that substantially reduced demand for cooling.


China's contribution to clean power growth was massive, making up more than half of the Q1-Q3 solar growth at 280 TWh. The US and the EU followed with a growth of 71 TWh (+30%) and 52 TWh (+20%), respectively.


The Next Challenge: Sustained Decline

This moment marks a definitive structural shift where clean energy sources are proving they can meet and exceed the accelerating pace of global electricity demand.


For the first time outside of disruptive events like the Global Financial Crisis or the COVID-19 pandemic—years which saw low or no electricity demand growth—clean power has not only kept pace but surpassed demand growth. The share of solar and wind in the global electricity mix rose from 15.2% in Q1-Q3 2024 to 17.6% in Q1-Q3 2025, and all low-carbon sources combined achieved a 43.0% share.


The report concludes that the new challenge is to sustain this growth in 2026 and beyond, which is necessary not only to meet continued strong electricity demand but also to drive fossil generation down from its current levels. This unprecedented stagnation in 2025 is a powerful sign that the world is on the cusp of an accelerated energy transition.

The Land Trap: Global Climate Pledges Betray Forests for Unrealistic Land Schemes


Wazzup Pilipinas!? 



Bélém, Brazil (12 November 2025)—A new global analysis released today at the COP30 climate summit issues a stark warning: the world is facing a "land gap" and a "forest gap" that threaten to undermine the entire fight against climate change. The study finds that national climate plans submitted for COP30 are overwhelmingly relying on massive, unachievable land-based carbon removal schemes—like vast tree planting—while dangerously neglecting the crucial, immediate work of protecting existing forests.


The report, "The Land Gap 2025," led by a global consortium of experts from the University of Melbourne, concludes that the true impediment to forest protection is not merely a lack of finance, but a deeply flawed global economic system that forces countries to choose economic survival over ecosystem preservation.


"Why are so many countries ignoring forest protection as a key pillar of climate targets?" asks Kate Dooley, the report’s lead author. "The answer is that they live in a world where heavy sovereign debt burdens and industry-friendly tax and trade policies force many of them to exploit forests to keep their economies from crashing".


The Land Gap: An Area Larger Than Australia 

The analysis exposes the two critical flaws in current national climate plans:



The "Land Gap": This is the chasm between governments’ reliance on land-based efforts to meet carbon mitigation goals and what is actually achievable. The assessment of COP30 pledges reveals a startling demand for land:


To achieve their targets under the Paris Agreement, countries would have to devote just over 1 billion hectares of land to carbon removal initiatives.


This required land mass is larger than the size of Australia.


This massive level of carbon removal would put lands critical to the survival of marginalized groups—including Indigenous peoples, local communities, and smallholder farmers—at risk.


Moreover, the promised emissions savings would take decades to materialize.



The "Forest Gap": While pledges for halting and reversing deforestation are "limited" in national plans, the report reveals a massive gap between global commitments made at COP28 to halt deforestation and degradation by 2030 and the likely outcome of current pledges. The report forecasts a dismal outcome:


The annual rate of global deforestation would still be 4 million hectares in 2030.


An additional 16 million hectares of forests would be degraded.


This creates a terrifying forest gap of 20 million hectares.


Debt, Tax, and Trade: The Triple Threat to Forests 

The experts argue that focusing solely on innovative financing, while important, fails to address the powerful underlying forces driving forest destruction. For instance, while the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) might generate $3 to $4 billion per year, the total need to achieve 2030 forest protection goals is an astronomical $117 to $299 billion per year.


The report identifies the rules and financial flows of the global economic system as the single biggest threat to forests. They conclude that meeting climate and forest commitments requires major reforms in three key areas:


1. Providing Debt Relief

Current approaches to resolving debt crises deepen dependence on short-term commodity revenue, pushing plantations, mines, and oil wells into previously intact ecosystems.


Countries in critical biodiversity centers like the Amazon, Congo basins, and Southeast Asia are being forced by austerity and debt payment schedules to rapidly expand exports—often by sacrificing their forests—to avoid credit downgrades.


The example of Cameroon is cited, where debt burdens and IMF austerity requirements have caused a dramatic rise in forest loss to increase hardwood, cotton, and cocoa production.


2. Pursuing Tax Reforms


Cross-border tax abuse and illicit financial flows deprive Global South countries of essential revenue needed for protection efforts.


International financial secrecy shields multinational corporations from accountability and facilitates environmental criminality, including illegal logging and land conversion.


The report singles out the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation as a historic opportunity to create a sustainable development tax system.


It also cites proposals advanced by Brazil to create a "wealth tax" that could generate an estimated $200 to $500 billion annually.


3. Revising Trade Rules

Current trade policies have fallen short by focusing primarily on limiting trade in illegal wood instead of addressing the expansion of industrial-scale agricultural production, which is the single largest driver of deforestation.


Trade rules reinforce the power of global commodity traders at the expense of local producers, undermining the authority of governments to police harmful practices.


Promising reforms involve shifting agriculture trade policies to prioritize sustainable food systems, smallholder farmers, and resilient ecosystems.


A Necessary Reckoning 

"There is an urgent need for leaders at COP30 to acknowledge that we will not make progress in the fight against climate change—especially when it comes to protecting forests—if we don't address the fundamental elements of our economic system that are impeding change," said Kate Horner, co-lead author of the report.


The study argues that aligning climate, biodiversity, and economic goals is possible through these reforms. Dr. Rebecca Ray of Boston University notes that reshaping these economic rules "could relieve pressure to exploit forests to meet short-term obligations, which could have an immediate impact on deforestation levels while freeing up large amounts of money to invest in forests".


The consequences of failure—the continued destruction of the world's remaining forests and a planet on a collision course with climate catastrophe—should be sufficient motivation to act.

The Final Countdown: Global CO 2 Emissions Hit a Record High as the 1.5 ∘C Carbon Budget is 'Virtually Exhausted'


Wazzup Pilipinas!? 



In a stark and urgent report, the Global Carbon Budget 2025 paints a picture of a planet caught in a devastating contradiction: global fossil fuel emissions have surged to a new record high, even as the window to limit global warming to 1.5 ∘C slams shut.


New research from the Global Carbon Project confirms that global carbon emissions from fossil fuels are projected to rise by 1.1% in 2025, reaching an all-time peak. This single year's activity is expected to inject 38.1 billion tonnes of fossil carbon dioxide (CO 2) into the atmosphere. With this projected increase, the concentration of CO 2in the atmosphere is set to reach 425.7 ppm in 2025, marking a 52% increase above pre-industrial levels (around 278 ppm in 1750).


The Fading Carbon Budget: Four Years Left

The most alarming finding of the report is the immediate threat to the Paris Agreement's most ambitious target. The remaining carbon budget for limiting global warming to 1.5 ∘C is now considered "virtually exhausted".


Starting from the beginning of 2026, the remaining carbon budget for a 50% likelihood of keeping warming under 1.5 ∘C is a mere 50 GtC (or 170 GtCO 2).


At the projected emissions rate of 2025, this critical budget will be consumed in approximately four years.


The carbon budgets for limiting warming to 1.7 ∘C and 2 ∘C have also been severely diminished, reduced to enough for about 12 and 25 years respectively at current emission levels.


Growth in the World's Major Emitters

The overall global rise is fueled by projected increases in emissions from major economies, in some cases reversing recent positive trends.


The projected surge in global fossil fuel emissions for 2025 is driven by increases across all major fuel types, with gas, oil, and coal all expected to rise by 1.3%, 1.0%, and 0.8% respectively, compared to 2024 levels.


Nature's Fading Defense: The Sinks are Straining

While human emissions spike, the Earth's natural defense systems—the ocean and land carbon sinks—are showing signs of severe strain due to climate change.


The report finds that climate change and climate variability are weakening the combined land and ocean carbon sinks.


Since 1960, this weakening effect is responsible for 8% of the rise in atmospheric CO 2 concentration.


The ocean sink's ability to absorb carbon has been "stagnant" since 2016, a trend influenced by the recent ocean heatwave of 2023-2024 in the Northern Hemisphere.


However, the land sink—which absorbs CO 2 through natural ecosystems—is expected to show a significant recovery in 2025, returning to pre-El Niño levels. This recovery follows a strong reduction in 2024 due to the prolonged 2023-2024 El Niño weather pattern.


A Single Beacon of Hope

Despite the overall devastating trend, the research highlights that efforts to decarbonize are beginning to take root in some nations. The number of countries successfully reducing their emissions while simultaneously growing their economies nearly doubled in the last decade. During the period 2015-2024, a total of 35 countries saw their fossil CO 2​emissions decrease even as their economies expanded.


However, this progress remains insufficient to counteract the overwhelming growth in global energy demand. To keep the 1.5 ∘C goal alive, the required cuts in emissions—an average reduction of 4% of 2025 total anthropogenic emissions each year until 2050—would need to be comparable to the dramatic, global drop observed during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.


With the remaining carbon budget for 1.5 ∘C equivalent to less than four years of current emissions, the time for incremental change has ended. The new Global Carbon Budget makes it clear: the world must achieve an immediate, dramatic, and sustained decline in global emissions to avert the virtually exhausted climate crisis.


No table format


The Final Countdown: Global CO 2

  Emissions Hit a Record High as the 1.5 ∘C Carbon Budget is 'Virtually Exhausted'

In a stark and urgent report, the Global Carbon Budget 2025 paints a picture of a planet caught in a devastating contradiction: global fossil fuel emissions have surged to a new record high, even as the window to limit global warming to 1.5 ∘C slams shut.


An Alarming New Global Record

New research from the Global Carbon Project confirms that global carbon emissions from fossil fuels are projected to rise by 1.1% in 2025, reaching an all-time peak. This single year's activity is expected to inject an unprecedented 38.1 billion tonnes of fossil carbon dioxide (CO 2) into the atmosphere. With this projected increase, the concentration of CO 2 in the atmosphere is set to reach 425.7 ppm in 2025. This is a staggering 52% increase above the pre-industrial level of around 278 ppm in 1750.


The overall global rise is driven by increases across all major fuel types compared to 2024 levels: gas emissions are projected to rise by 1.3%, oil by 1.0%, and coal by 0.8%.


The 1.5 ∘C Carbon Budget Disappears

The most alarming finding of the report is the immediate threat to the Paris Agreement's most ambitious target. The remaining carbon budget for limiting global warming to 1.5 ∘C is now considered "virtually exhausted".


Starting from the beginning of 2026, the total remaining carbon budget that gives a 50% likelihood of staying under 1.5 ∘C is only 170 GtCO 2(or 50 GtC). At the projected total anthropogenic emissions rate of 2025, this critical budget will be consumed in approximately four years. The carbon budgets for limiting warming to 1.7 ∘C and 2 ∘C have also been severely diminished, reduced to enough for about 12 and 25 years respectively at current emission levels.


Major Economies Reverse Course

The projected surge in global fossil fuel emissions is fueled by increases in major economies, in some cases reversing positive trends from previous years.


Emissions in the United States are projected to increase by +1.9% in 2025, reversing a long-term downward trend.


The European Union (EU27) is also projected to see an increase of +0.4%, similarly reversing a previous decrease.



India's emissions are projected to increase by +1.4%.



China is expected to see a slight increase of +0.4%.


Only a few major economies are projected to show a decrease, such as Japan with a projected fall of −2.2%.


Earth's Natural Sinks are Straining

While human emissions climb, the planet's natural carbon sinks—the vast ocean and land ecosystems that absorb CO 2—are showing signs of severe strain.


The overall weakening of these combined land and ocean sinks due to climate change is responsible for an estimated 8% of the rise in atmospheric CO 2 concentration since 1960.


The ocean sink's ability to absorb carbon has been "stagnant" since 2016.


On land, the end of the 2023-2024 El Niño weather pattern—which typically causes heat and drought—is expected to allow the land sink to recover entirely in 2025, returning to pre-El Niño levels after a strong reduction in 2024.


A Narrow Path Forward

Despite the devastating global trend, the report highlights that successful decarbonization efforts are possible. The number of countries that managed to reduce their fossil CO 2 emissions while simultaneously growing their economies nearly doubled in the last decade (2015-2024), reaching a total of 35 countries.


However, this progress is being swiftly outpaced by the growth in global energy demand. To meet the Paris Agreement's goal of limiting warming to 1.7 ∘C (well below 2 ∘C) and reach net-zero by 2050, total anthropogenic CO 2 emissions must be cut by an average of 4% each year starting from 2025. This rate of decline is comparable in magnitude to the massive, globally coordinated reduction in emissions observed during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. With the most ambitious 1.5 ∘C target now essentially lost, only an immediate, dramatic, and sustained global decline in emissions can preserve a pathway toward the higher-level climate goals.

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

The Reckoning: The 2025 World Energy Outlook Declares the Energy Transition Irreversible, Even as the World Dares to Look Back


Wazzup Pilipinas!? 



The International Energy Agency’s (IEA) 2025 World Energy Outlook (WEO) arrives not merely as a forecast, but as a battlefield dispatch in a global war for the future. Against a backdrop of intense political pressure from forces seeking to revive the fortunes of fossil fuels—including from the US Republican Party and the Trump administration—the IEA's core message is defiant and absolute: The energy transition is inevitable.


The sheer weight of economics and technology has forced a global reckoning, leaving governments and investors with a stark choice: accelerate toward a secure, clean future, or cling to a costly past and face a disastrous climate catastrophe.


The Irreversible Tide: Fossil Fuels Face a 2030 Deadline

The WEO's central premise, laid out in its Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS), is devastating for legacy energy. The IEA now projects that demand for both oil and coal will peak by or before 2030. The growth of natural gas demand is barely a whimper, set to rise only 10% from current levels, which immediately raises urgent questions about where the massive wave of new LNG export capacity will be deployed.


The engine driving this historic shift is the unchallenged rise of clean energy.


"The IEA shows we will build more renewables between now and 2030 than in the last 40 years combined," asserts Bruce Douglas, CEO of the Global Renewables Alliance. "An energy revolution is underway—and fossil fuels are on the growth sidelines".


Renewables are no longer a policy choice but an economic mandate. They are now so competitive that their growth is "locked in," growing faster than any other major energy source, even in the most conservative Current Policies Scenario (CPS). Nearly all new electricity demand—spurred by manufacturing, electric vehicles, and AI—will be supplied by renewable energy.


This wholesale economic transformation has profound implications for climate action. The IEA has once again confirmed its long-held position that if the world is to successfully limit warming to 1.5°C, the supply from existing oil and gas fields is more than sufficient to meet future demand. No new projects are needed.


The New Battleground: Grids, Data, and Critical Vulnerabilities

In this new energy landscape, the WEO identifies energy security as the central theme, but its nature has fundamentally changed. The vulnerability has shifted from the volatile price of crude oil to the fragile infrastructure of the future.


In a landmark finding that crystallizes the tectonic shift in global investment priorities, the WEO reveals that the world's hunger for digital services has hit a new extreme: Investment in data centers is expected to reach $580 billion in 2025, surpassing the $540 billion invested in global oil supply for the year.


The next great frontier is data center energy use and Artificial Intelligence (AI). This "explosive growth" is geographically concentrated—largely in the United States, China, and the European Union—putting unprecedented strain on already congested electricity grids.


The race to electrify also exposes a new, acute vulnerability: critical minerals. Traditional risks to oil and gas supply are now accompanied by the risk of disruption to the critical mineral supply chains necessary for grids, batteries, and EVs. The key security challenge is unprecedented market concentration, as a single country dominates the refining process for a shocking 19 out of 20 strategic energy-related minerals.


The pivotal issue for energy security is therefore the speed at which new grids, storage, and system flexibility are implemented. This highlights the necessity for governments to deliver on the COP29 pledge on grids to keep their energy systems secure.


A Stark Choice: Survival or the Dystopian Path

The ultimate drama of the WEO 2025 is the stark contrast between the future pathways the world can still choose:


The Survival Path (Net Zero Emissions - NZE): This is the path of necessary, heroic effort. It maps out a trajectory to net zero emissions by 2050, but the IEA is clear: due to persistent high emissions, an overshoot of the 1.5°C target is now inevitable. Warming is projected to peak around 1.65 ∘C before returning below 1.5 ∘C by 2100—a result that hinges on both a very rapid transformation of the energy sector and the widespread deployment of carbon removal technologies that are currently unproven at scale.


The Business-as-Usual Path (Stated Policies - STEPS): This central scenario, where policies already tabled are followed, is not enough. It leads to a disastrous temperature rise of around 2.5 ∘C by 2100.


The Dystopian Path (Current Policies - CPS): The IEA was pressured to include an updated scenario of political backsliding. David Tong of Oil Change International calls this "Donald Trump's dystopian future", where the world abandons its efforts, renewables adoption stalls , and oil and gas demand continue to grow through 2050. The consequence? A catastrophic warming of almost 3 ∘C by 2100.


"Some may wish to turn back the clock, but the direction of the energy system is clear... The choice now is between accelerating or paying later to undo the damage: every tonne of carbon we avoid today saves far greater costs tomorrow," warns Laurence Tubiana, CEO of the European Climate Foundation.


The WEO 2025 is a global alarm bell, underscoring that the energy revolution is a freight train that has already left the station, driven by market forces and technological ingenuity. The only remaining question is whether governments will stand on the tracks and try to derail it—a bet, as one expert notes, "against progress", with the fate of the planet hanging in the balance.

THE CLIMAX OF CARBON: China’s 18-Month Emissions Plateau and the Global Showdown at COP30


Wazzup Pilipinas!? 



I. Prologue: The Shifting Tectonic Plates of Global Emissions

The trajectory of global climate mitigation has reached a critical inflection point, centered on the world’s largest emitter. A recent analysis conducted by Lauri Myllyvirta of the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) for Carbon Brief reveals that China’s carbon dioxide (CO 2) emissions were statistically unchanged from a year earlier in the third quarter of 2025. This finding extends an unprecedented trend of flat or falling emissions that commenced in March 2024, persisting for a full 18 months.   


This stabilization occurs at a moment of heightened international urgency, coinciding precisely with the opening of the COP30 climate negotiations in Belém, Brazil. While the swing in annual emissions may seem minor—with the full-year 2025 total balanced between a slight rise or fall of 1% or less—its symbolic weight is immense. For years, Chinese policymakers had reserved political space for emissions to continue their ascent. The current plateau suggests that the structural decoupling of economic expansion from emissions growth may be significantly advancing the timeline for peak CO 2


Historically, previous short-term dips in China's emissions—such as those observed in 2009, 2012, 2015, and 2022—were predominantly attributable to external economic shocks, domestic industrial slumps, or severe public health measures like the zero-Covid policy. Crucially, the 2025 stabilization represents a departure from these cyclical patterns. This sustained 18-month trend is occurring even as China’s core economic engine, measured by rising electricity demand, accelerated its growth to 6.1% year-on-year in Q3, up from 3.7% in the first half of the year. This is the first verifiable instance where overwhelming clean power generation has structurally outpaced rising energy consumption over a prolonged period, confirming that the internal dynamics of the energy transition are now the primary driver of emissions stagnation.   


The current data strongly validates the projections defined in more optimistic climate models. Specifically, the Climate Action Tracker (CAT) had previously detailed an "optimistic scenario" where absolute greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in China could peak as early as 2025, driven by accelerated renewable deployment. The Carbon Brief analysis provides hard evidence that this accelerated deployment is a reality. The stabilization of emissions in the face of rising demand suggests that the foundational challenge is shifting from building supply capacity to managing industrial complexity and infrastructure rigidity.   


Internationally, this data significantly alters the geopolitical landscape at COP30. With emissions stabilized or falling, the foundational argument employed by China—that it requires several more years of growth space to complete its modernization—is politically weakened. Global observers are now empowered by this success to demand that China elevate the ambition of its newly submitted 2035 Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC), which analysts currently deem conservative, arguing that the 7-10% reduction target from peak emissions by 2035 is likely achievable under existing policy momentum.   


II. The Clean Energy Juggernaut: Revolution in the Power Sector

The central narrative of China’s emissions plateau is the unparalleled, relentless deployment of renewable energy capacity, which has successfully decoupled the power sector from accelerating electricity demand.


The Quantitative Leap and Decoupling Mechanism

The power sector, historically the largest source of CO 2 emissions, saw its output remain flat year-on-year in Q3 2025. This achievement is particularly striking because it occurred despite robust, accelerating growth in electricity demand, primarily driven by rising industrial activity and higher cooling needs during hotter summers. The successful offset mechanism was massive generation increases from intermittent sources: Solar generation surged by 46% year-on-year, while wind generation rose by 11% in the third quarter of 2025.   


The engine behind this structural shift is the country's record-smashing capacity additions. In the first nine months of 2025 alone, China connected 240 gigawatts (GW) of solar and 61 GW of wind capacity, positioning the country to set yet another new annual renewable record. This scale is globally unprecedented; by June 2025, China’s installed solar and wind capacity had already reached 1,673 GW, exceeding its original 2030 NDC target of 1,200 GW years ahead of schedule. The sheer volume means that China’s total installed solar photovoltaic capacity now surpasses 1,000 GW, representing half of the world's total installed solar capacity.   


This sustained, record capacity installation has profound systemic consequences. In the first half of 2025, the addition of solar (167.7 TWh) and wind (79.2 TWh) generation successfully absorbed the entirety of the 198 TWh demand growth, allowing coal generation to be cut by 55.5 TWh. The data confirms that rising demand no longer automatically translates into rising coal consumption. The power sector is structurally on the path to deep decarbonization, transitioning the primary technical barrier away from technology manufacturing and towards infrastructure flexibility.   


The Grid’s Stress Test: A Race Against Curtailment

The speed of the clean energy buildout has introduced a new, critical constraint: the rapid installation of renewable power is now substantially outpacing the growth rate of the necessary power grid infrastructure and energy storage solutions. This disparity creates a paradox, where success in deployment leads to increased inefficiencies, primarily manifested as renewable energy curtailment—the waste of electricity generated because supply overwhelms demand or transmission bottlenecks prevent delivery.   


Curtailment is most pronounced in the massive renewables hubs in the sparsely populated interior, which rely on transmission lines stretching thousands of miles to reach the major demand centers in the eastern provinces. System experts note that integrating this massive, fluctuating power supply requires a completely modernized power system that coordinates generation, grid operations, load management, and storage.   


In response to this urgent bottleneck, China has aggressively accelerated its energy storage strategy. The country's "Special Action Plan" mandates the addition of 180 GW of new energy storage capacity by 2027, effectively doubling the current installed base. By mid-2025, China’s new-type energy storage capacity had already surpassed 100 GW, cementing its global leadership position in storage implementation, driven by the need to optimize utilization of its vast, intermittent clean energy resources.   


The figures below summarize the success of the decoupling engine in the power and transport sectors, while simultaneously highlighting the remaining internal challenge posed by industrial activity.

  

III. The Silent Decarbonization: Transport and Heavy Industry

Beyond the visible triumph of the power sector, critical but less discussed shifts in transport and heavy industry contributed significantly to the 18-month emissions plateau.


EV Velocity: The Road to Oil Displacement

The transport sector reached a significant tipping point, with CO 2​ emissions from fuel use dropping by 5% year-on-year in Q3 2025. This rapid emissions reduction is a direct consequence of the overwhelming success of China’s New Energy Vehicle (NEV) strategy. In the first half of 2025, NEV sales (encompassing battery electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids) surged by 33% to over 5.45 million units, decisively outpacing the sales of traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, which declined by 5.2%.   


This exponential adoption rate is rooted in China's assertive industrial policy. The strategy has cultivated powerful local brands, led by market giants like BYD, which have driven market share for foreign brands down to just 31% in 2025, a dramatic decline from 64% in 2020. This local dominance has sparked intense price wars, with manufacturers slashing prices and incorporating high-value features, such as advanced driver-assistance systems, into baseline models at no extra cost. This combination of affordability and high quality accelerates consumer adoption, driving a structural reduction in transportation emissions.   


The geopolitical implication is clear: China’s leadership in EV manufacturing, producing 70% of the global EV fleet , is not merely an economic victory but a core component of its energy security strategy. Decarbonizing the vehicle fleet reduces the nation’s vulnerability to international oil price fluctuations and the security risks associated with relying heavily on maritime oil imports.   


Contraction in Construction Materials

The final component contributing to the plateau was a contraction in activity within heavy industries. Declines in cement and steel production saw associated emissions fall. This contraction reflects broader economic restructuring and stabilization in the construction sector following years of rapid build-out.   


To ensure these temporary dips translate into permanent structural reductions, policymakers are deploying new regulatory levers. The national Emissions Trading System (ETS), which previously focused only on the power sector, was officially expanded in March 2025 to cover steel, cement, and aluminum industries. This expansion incorporates approximately 3,700 covered entities, collectively managing about 8 billion tonnes of CO 2 equivalent.   


The transition in these high-emission sectors is phased: while initial allowance allocation (2024-2026) remains intensity-controlled and production-output-based, the long-term plan, beginning in Phase 2 (2027), is to progressively tighten the system by optimizing allocation against advanced intensity levels. This phased tightening in heavy industry is a preparatory step for the coming enforcement of absolute emissions controls, necessary to lock in these sectoral reductions.   


IV. The Carbon Backdraft: The Coal-to-Chemicals Dilemma

The stability achieved through the clean energy juggernaut and transport decarbonization is currently being balanced—and potentially threatened—by an aggressive and growing counterweight: the coal-to-chemicals industry.


The Industrial Counterweight and the Surge in Coal Use

The chemical sector emerged as the single largest obstacle to sustained emissions decline in Q3 2025, with its surge in CO 2 output fully offsetting the reductions achieved in power, transport, cement, and steel. This sector was the only major segment of the economy to see emissions growth.   


The magnitude of this counter-force is striking: coal consumption within the chemical sector increased by a dramatic 20% year-on-year in the first half of 2025, following a 10% increase the previous year. Concurrently, non-transport oil demand, primarily driven by the production of plastics and other chemicals, grew by 10% in Q3. This boom in the production of synthetic fuels and petrochemical products relies heavily on converting coal—a highly carbon-intensive process known as coal-to-olefins or coal-to-liquids.   


The climate penalty is severe. Coal-based chemical production is significantly more carbon-intensive than traditional petrochemical production methods using natural gas or oil. For instance, producing ammonia using coal feedstock emits approximately 2.2 times more CO 2 than using natural gas. Furthermore, these coal conversion projects are environmentally destructive in two ways: they emit nearly three times as much CO 2 during the conversion process as is released when the synthetic gas is burned , and they place massive strain on water resources, which are scarce in the main coal-to-chemicals regions.   


Drivers: Geopolitics, Security, and Economics

The core drivers of this coal-to-chemicals boom are deeply entrenched in China’s strategic priorities. The country operates from an inherently "coal-rich, oil-poor, and gas-poor" resource endowment. As the world’s largest importer of oil and LNG, China views its high dependence on foreign fossil fuels as a severe vulnerability, particularly concerning the risk of maritime blockade. Prioritizing energy security necessitates increasing domestic production of synthetic fuels and petrochemical feedstocks, even if the process is environmentally damaging.   


This strategic imperative is amplified by market forces. Low coal prices during 2025 made coal conversion economically advantageous. Coal-based olefins were generating strong profit margins, while production based on oil-based naphtha or propane faced losses. This combination of strategic security concerns and favorable local economics incentivizes the rapid, large-scale expansion of these projects, often with heavy backing from local governments.   


This coal-to-chemicals boom represents a zero-sum conflict within China’s policy framework. The high emissions intensity of these projects is the primary reason the nation is set to miss its 2020–2025 carbon intensity target. The sector is effectively acting as a carbon sponge, soaking up the emissions reductions gained from the nation’s world-leading renewable energy deployment. This internal policy contradiction—where national security and industrial profitability undermine climate goals—demands a fundamental policy restructuring.   

  

V. Policy Ambition, Targets, and the Path Forward

China’s current climate performance demands a reassessment of its targets and regulatory mechanisms for the decade ahead, defined by the failure of a key intensity goal and the necessity of shifting to absolute caps.


The Penalty Box: Missing the 2025 Carbon Intensity Target

Based on current trends, China is projected to miss its domestic 14th Five-Year Plan (FYP) target of an 18% reduction in carbon intensity (emissions per unit of GDP) from 2020 levels by 2025. This failure is primarily attributed to the high emissions intensity associated with the surging coal-to-chemicals and synthetic fuel production sectors, which grew under the previous regulatory regime.   


The consequence of this shortfall is significant: missing the 2025 target means that China must undertake steeper and more decisive emissions reductions immediately after 2025 to meet its more ambitious 2030 NDC goal of achieving a 65% reduction in carbon intensity from 2005 levels. This political and economic necessity provides the foundational justification for the next phase of policy tightening.   


NDC 3.0: The Economy-Wide Pledge

On November 3, 2025, China formally submitted its updated 2035 NDC to the UNFCCC. This new pledge represents a significant expansion in scope, covering the entire economy and addressing all major greenhouse gases (GHGs) for the first time, moving beyond its previous focus primarily on CO 2


The core quantitative commitment is an absolute target: to cut economy-wide net GHG emissions by 7–10% from their peak level by 2035. While setting an absolute cap is a landmark move, expert analysts generally categorize the target as conservative. Projections suggest that the 7-10% cut is largely achievable under existing policies, particularly if the current momentum in renewable deployment continues and the 2025 CO 2​ peak scenario holds.   


Regulatory Tightening: The Dual-Control Future

The policy tool designed to resolve the current conflict between economic security and climate ambition is the "dual-control of carbon" system, which manages both total (absolute) and intensity-based emissions. Policy guidance issued in August 2025 established a roadmap for this crucial transition away from purely intensity-based controls to hybrid and eventually absolute caps within the ETS framework.   


The commitment to implement the dual-control system, reaffirmed in the lead-up to the 15th Five-Year Plan (2026–2030) , is the necessary structural solution to address the carbon backdraft from the chemical sector. Since high-carbon industrial projects, driven by security and economic incentives, directly undermine intensity targets, only an absolute emissions cap can enforce limits on the total scale of conversion projects or compel major investment in low-carbon feedstocks.   


The expectation is that the next FYP (2026-2030) will contain a clear intention to "phase down coal consumption". Given China’s proven track record of overachieving non-fossil targets—such as exceeding its 2030 wind and solar capacity goal and forest stock target years ahead of schedule —the political and economic momentum exists to ratify these non-emissions targets with increased ambition, even if the formal NDC remains conservative. The success of the clean energy buildout has generated a self-reinforcing dynamic where policy goals must be continually revised upward to keep pace with reality.   

  

VI. The View from Belém: China’s Data at COP30

The publication of China's 18-month emissions analysis provides critical, actionable data for negotiators gathered at COP30, where the international community is debating how to address the widening gap in emissions-cut ambition and translate global fossil fuel phase-out agreements into concrete national strategies.   


Informing the Global Stocktake and Ambition Gap

The Global Stocktake (GST), which assessed progress toward the Paris goals in 2023, concluded that the world is not on track. The GST highlighted priority areas such as tripling renewable energy capacity and driving down transport emissions. China’s data provides the strongest evidence globally that these key transitional strategies are feasible, even for the world’s largest industrial economy.   


However, the data also highlights the deep policy fracture inherent in translating global commitments into national action. While COP30 seeks concrete steps to transition away from fossil fuels , China simultaneously demonstrates unparalleled success in scaling renewables and an increased commitment to coal-based industrial feedstocks driven by strategic security concerns. This conflicting reality presents a severe challenge for reaching a unified agreement on the implementation of fossil fuel phase-out agreements.   


Geopolitical Power Play: The Clean Tech Democracy

China’s industrial strategy has successfully positioned the nation not merely as the world’s largest emitter, but as the indispensable provider of the global climate solution infrastructure. China’s exports of electric vehicles, solar panels, and batteries—the foundational pillars of the new energy economy—surged to $120 billion in the first seven months of 2025.   


This dominance in manufacturing has had a profound, democratizing effect on global decarbonization. China’s efficiency and economies of scale are credited with driving down solar panel prices by over 80% in the last decade. This cost revolution makes sustainable energy solutions more affordable and accessible than ever before, enabling many developing nations in the Global South to bypass fossil-fuel systems and move directly to modern, low-carbon grids.   


By simultaneously stabilizing its domestic emissions through clean power and supplying the technology for global decarbonization, China reinforces its geopolitical leverage at multilateral forums like COP30. The evidence of structural decoupling, combined with the successful democratization of clean energy access, fundamentally shifts the debate on climate finance, equity, and the feasibility of aggressive decarbonization pathways outlined in the Paris Agreement.   


VII. Conclusion: From Milestone to Momentum

The analysis confirming 18 months of flat or falling CO 2​ emissions in China marks a global climate milestone. It is a definitive demonstration that structural decoupling between economic vitality and CO 2 growth is achievable through overwhelming investment in renewables and aggressive industrial policy in the transport sector. The power sector’s success, where 46% solar growth offsets a 6.1% demand acceleration, confirms the viability of the most optimistic peak projections.


However, this emissions plateau is structurally fragile. It represents a maximum point of tension, not a final resolution. The stability achieved by the clean energy juggernaut is held hostage by the rising tide of the highly carbon-intensive coal-to-chemicals industry, driven by geopolitical energy security imperatives and favorable economics. This industrial counter-force directly resulted in the projected miss of the 2020–2025 carbon intensity target.


The Imperative for the Decade Ahead

To convert the 2025 emissions plateau into a decisive and rapid decline, China must prioritize two critical actions in its next policy cycle:


Enforce Absolute Caps and Dual Control: The necessity of missing the carbon intensity target must be leveraged politically to accelerate the effective implementation of the “dual-control of carbon” system. Policymakers must move swiftly to introduce and strictly enforce absolute emissions caps across the newly integrated industrial sectors (steel, cement, chemicals) through the ETS, directly capping the total output of high-carbon conversion projects that currently bypass intensity controls.


Prioritize Grid Flexibility and Storage: China must treat its power grid and energy storage infrastructure as the primary bottleneck to emissions reduction. The aggressive 180 GW storage rollout plan by 2027 must be executed efficiently, alongside necessary investments in grid modernization and long-distance transmission, ensuring that every newly installed gigawatt of world-leading solar and wind capacity translates directly into displaced fossil fuel generation, rather than wasted power.


The stabilization of emissions is the climax of one phase of China's transition. Its subsequent ability to navigate the complex trade-offs between energy security and industrial decarbonization through robust policy enforcement will determine not only its success in meeting its 2030 targets but the feasibility of the global 1.5 degrees Celsius commitment. China’s action, or inaction, in the next five years will set the precedent for structural industrial decarbonization worldwide.


The Circular Revolution: Why Linear Thinking is a Recipe for Disaster and How a New Economy Can Save Us


Wazzup Pilipinas!? 



For centuries, industry has operated on a perilous, one-way street: Take, Make, Dispose. This linear model, the engine of modern progress, has proven to be a devastating, unsustainable recipe. As global greenhouse gas emissions continue to climb—with a staggering 55% stemming from energy production and use, and another 45% tied to industrial and agricultural processes—the stakes could not be higher.


We stand at a critical juncture. The path to achieving net-zero emissions, a goal essential for the survival of our planet, requires nothing short of a radical, system-wide overhaul. The answer isn't just efficiency; it's a fundamental shift to a Circular Economy, an operational model that treats resources not as disposable inputs, but as assets to be endlessly cherished and reused.


The Economic Case for Circularity: $2 Trillion Reasons to Change

The transition to a circular model is often framed as an environmental imperative, but it is also one of the most powerful economic opportunities of our time. Systematic climate and resource efficiency policies could unlock substantial economic benefits, with an estimated $2 trillion in annual savings by 2050. This isn't small-scale greenwashing; this is a grand-scale economic redesign.


The circular economy directly tackles the root cause of environmental damage by reducing the extraction of primary materials, conserving energy, and minimizing waste. To achieve this, companies must adopt the strategic "2Rs" (Redefine and Redesign) over the traditional "3Rs" (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle), focusing on fundamentally addressing issues at the entry point of the entire economic model.


The 3 Core Principles: Architects of a New System

The Circular Economy is built on three seismic shifts in how we conceptualize and operate business:


1. Product-as-a-Service (PaaS)

This principle demands a fundamental change in business models, shifting from selling products to selling their function. It means innovating product designs at the source to meet more needs with fewer resources while ensuring the absolute possibility of subsequent circulation.


The Insight: When a company retains ownership of the product, its incentive shifts from designing for obsolescence to designing for durability, repair, and easy recovery. The product becomes a valued asset, not a throwaway commodity.


2. High-Value Utilization

If resources are the lifeblood of our economy, we must stop letting them bleed out. High-value utilization means ensuring resources are kept in closed loops and utilized at their maximum value. The goal is to minimize downcycling—the process of recycling into lower-value materials—and eliminate resource degradation entirely.


The Insight: Every material should have a planned next life. This requires meticulous tracking and innovative processing to maintain purity and quality throughout multiple cycles.


3. Systems Partnership

Achieving a true circular economy cannot be the burden of a single entity. It requires collaboration, achieving mutual symbiosis across enterprises and industries. This principle involves enhancing the opportunities and benefits of resource circulation through robust partnership.


The Insight: Over one-third of Taiwan’s annual greenhouse gas emissions are related to exports. A company’s net-zero goal cannot be met in isolation; it must span the entire supply chain, from the upstream extraction of raw materials to downstream consumption. This necessity gives rise to the critical mandate of Circular Collaboration For Climate (CC4CC).


Redefining Demand: The Behavioral Catalyst

While redesigning industrial supply is crucial, the global consensus, highlighted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), is that behavioral changes on the demand side can reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by up to 70%.


Achieving net-zero demands that everyone—from CEOs to consumers—redefines their needs and questions unnecessary desires. It starts with simple lifestyle changes: choosing to share resources rather than own them.


The Call to Action: Collaboration is Not Optional

Achieving net-zero emissions is not a solo sprint, but a team relay race. Companies often find that their efforts to scope their own emissions (Scope 1 and 2) are insufficient without considering the emissions of their entire supply chain (Scope 3).


The challenge—and the opportunity—is cross-industry and cross-national cooperation. This is the era of CC4CC, where businesses are invited to collaborate with their supply chain partners to accelerate circular economy practices, build a resilient future, and write the compelling stories of this bold new world.


The choice is clear: cling to the dying linear model and risk disaster, or embrace the circular revolution and unlock unprecedented value, sustainability, and resilience for generations to come. The time to act is now.

Tuesday, November 11, 2025

The Great Pivot: How Taiwan is Forging a Net-Zero, Resilient Future and Leading the World Out of the Linear Trap


Wazzup Pilipinas!? 



The Climate Abyss: A Call to Action

Since the establishment of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 30 years ago, global annual carbon emissions have not merely stabilized—they have surged. As the UN Secretary-General warns, "We are on a highway to climate hell with our foot still on the accelerator!" This "accelerator" is the linear economy, a model born of the Industrial Revolution that prioritizes profits and privatizes risks, treating costs as a necessary evil for economic stimulation.


But the planet faces a triple threat: high consumption, high pollution, and high carbon emissions. The traditional linear model—take, make, dispose—is not just unsustainable; it's a profound systemic failure. Just as treating a person's "three highs" (high blood pressure, high blood sugar, and high cholesterol) with medication alone fails to address the root cause, so too do piecemeal environmental efforts. We must fundamentally change our economic model.


Taiwan, an island nation densely populated and limited by a shortage of natural resources, understands this existential threat perhaps better than anyone. Nearly 260 million metric tons of raw materials are consumed annually, over 70% of which are imported. And every year, approximately 32 million metric tons of waste are generated.


The time for passive followership is over. It is time for proactive leadership.


The Transformation: Moving Beyond "Taiwan Can Help"

For the past sixty years, Taiwan played the role of a "follower," succeeding by reducing costs and improving efficiency in the global market. But in addressing the climate crisis, the opportunity is to transform from an efficiency engine into a global sustainability pioneer. The new rallying cry isn't just "Taiwan Can Help," it's "Taiwan Can Lead."


In 2017, the Executive Yuan launched the "5+2 Industrial Innovation Plan," signaling a crucial first step toward "circular economy" and "new agriculture" strategies. This national commitment has placed the transformation from the traditional linear model to a circular economy at the heart of its national policy, seeing it as the key to securing long-term environmental and economic competitiveness.


The Three-Pronged Strategy for Resource Circulation

Taiwan's Ministry of Environment, alongside the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Ministry of Agriculture, has adopted a robust "three-major circulation strategies" and "two key facilitation pillars" to reshape its industrial landscape:


Green Designs: Advocating for source reduction and green design at the material usage phase.


Resource Circulation: Developing technologies to expand the potential for waste-to-resource conversion, maximizing resource use efficiency.


Waste Balance and Treatment: Streamlining the resource circulation network across all sectors—upstream, midstream, and downstream industries.


This shift is not merely compliance; it’s a massive economic opportunity. The resource circulation industry is thriving, creating billions in value and generating numerous job opportunities in high-value sectors like recycling systems and advanced manufacturing.


Agriculture: The Front Line of Circularity

Nowhere is the pivot more evident than in agriculture, which is adopting a four-pillar guideline to reduce carbon emissions, promote circular agriculture, enhance carbon sinks, and accelerate net zero by 2040.


Agricultural circularity—a "full cycle and zero waste" model—is the main goal. It is transforming waste streams into high-value resources:


Animal Waste: Converting poultry and livestock manure into biogas and digestate for energy and fertilizer.


Crop Residues: Using materials like rice straw, soybean pulp, and mushroom compost to create high-value products like feed or organic fertilizers.


High-Value Products: Converting soy pulp into raw materials for plant-based meat, and transforming waste into renewable energy sources.


The goal is to secure a win-win situation: a balanced economic benefit paired with environmental sustainability, proving that prosperity and responsibility are not mutually exclusive.


The Industry Revolution: Innovating Waste into Wealth

Across industries, Taiwan is demonstrating its leadership:


ITRI’s Breakthrough: The Industrial Technology Research Institute has perfected high-strength, rut-resistant asphalt concrete using combined waste asphalt and steel slag, extending the service life of roads.


BenQ Dialysis Technology: Improving the production and manufacturing of hemodialyzers using automatic rejection equipment to sort reusable materials.


CPC/VP Developments: Joining forces to implement resource recovery facilities to recycle discarded PP plastic from industrial scraps and household plastic waste into new pedals.


The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) is actively supporting this shift by promoting the effective utilization of resources through "turning waste into treasure" programs. This innovation is foundational to developing and expanding the circular economy's footprint in product design, manufacturing, consumption, and waste management.


A Future Forged in Resilience

In fact, Taiwan is already a global leader in many sectors, such as semiconductors and AI, and is among the best in the world in resource recycling and circulation. However, this is not a time for complacency.


We cannot afford to waste the opportunities presented by this crisis. We must leverage the successes and failures of the past to fundamentally change five crucial aspects of people’s lives: livelihood opportunities, production models, ecological balance, and value of life.


A circular economy is the collective effort of all sectors, a social contract that brings together the contributions of public, private, and civil society. Taiwan is extending an open hand, sharing its exemplary models and hard-won expertise to build a greener, more resilient, and sustainable world.


Let us embrace this future full of hope. Let us move forward, not as followers, but as the leaders who chose to leave the linear economy behind, ensuring a prosperous future for generations to come. Taiwan Can Lead.

DepEd reports 312 damaged schools; Bicol, CALABARZON schools heavily hit by ‘Uwan



Wazzup Pilipinas!? 




MAKATI CITY, 10 November 2025 — The Department of Education (DepEd) reported that at least 312 public schools sustained infrastructure damage following the onslaught of Super Typhoon Uwan, with Bicol and CALABARZON among the hardest hit regions.


The November 10, 12pm Situation Report from the DepEd Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Service (DRRMS) showed that 1,182 classrooms suffered minor damage, 366 classrooms were majorly damaged, and 261 were totally damaged. These figures are still being verified as additional reports continue to arrive from regional and division offices.


Echoing President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr.’s call for all agencies to remain on full alert and safeguard the safety of their constituents, Education Secretary Sonny Angara assured affected communities that the department is committed to the immediate protection of students, teachers, and school personnel as well as the long-term continuity of learning.


“Mabigat ang pinagdadaanan ng ating mga guro, magulang, at mag-aaral sa nagdaang Bagyong Uwan at Tino. Nakikiramay tayo sa ating mga kababayan at tinitiyak namin sa DepEd na kasama ninyo kami sa bawat hakbang ng pagbangon at muling pagbuo ng pag-asa sa bawat silid-aralan,” Secretary Angara said.


Bicol, CALABARZON, and CAR recorded the highest numbers of damaged classrooms due to Uwan.


DepEd also reported that 5,572 classrooms in 1,072 schools across 11 regions are being used as evacuation centers, temporarily sheltering displaced families. The department continues to work closely with local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Councils (DRRMCs) for rapid assessment and relief coordination.


To address immediate recovery needs, DepEd has identified funding requirements of ₱20.2 million for clean-up and clearing operations and ₱57.9 million for minor repairs

PPC hosts storywriting workshop in Pangasinan

 


Wazzup Pilipinas?!



The creative landscape of Pangasinan got a boost as the Pangasinan Polytechnic College, in partnership with the Film Development Council of the Philippines, hosted the Pangasinan Storywriting Workshop: Screenwriting for Multimedia Platforms from November 6 to 7 at the Sison Auditorium in Lingayen.


Designed as a micro-credential course within the Film and Video Production for Multimedia Platform Series, the workshop was tailored for aspiring storytellers, multimedia arts students, creative professionals, and content creators. It aims to enhance participants’ skills in crafting compelling stories.


Sharing his wealth of industry knowledge was two-time Palanca awardee and Creative Director of GMA Network, filmmaker and screenwriter Aloy Adlawan. Adlawan also armed the attendees with crucial skills in pitching their stories as part of a new initiative to nurture the region’s creative talent.






The event kicked off with a welcome message from Assoc. Prof. Christopher Gozum, PPC Bachelor of Multimedia Arts Program Chair and PPC Film Society adviser. Inspirational messages were delivered by PPC President Dr. Raymundo D. Rovillos and Community Affairs Officer IV Atty. Kandace Lorraine Palagud, who spoke on behalf of Pangasinan Gov. Ramon V. Guico III.


A significant highlight was the Memorandum of Agreement signing ceremony between the PPC and the FDCP, led by Dr. Rovillos and FDCP Technical Consultant for Academic Linkages Seymour Sanchez. They were joined by FDCP Project Development Officer Korina Dela Cruz, Atty. Palagud, and Gozum.


The workshop treated attendees, many of whom were PPC multimedia arts students, to a special screening of compelling films that explored themes of struggle, family, and discovery.


The coming-of-age comedy “Blooming!” by Ronnie Ramos tells the story of Nena (Annika Co), a young girl who becomes fascinated by the parts of a flower while working on a school assignment.


Louchielle Ashley Hael’s short animated film “Signal Pending” brought the participants to the amusing and frantic journey of Max the Bunny who scrambles to submit a thesis project on time.


Cedrick Valenzuela’s “When It Rained Malunggay Leaves,” winner of the Sine Kabataan Best Film, Best Screenplay, and Best Editing, made the audience reflect on family, grief, and reconciliation, as the drama follows a daughter, Ariel (Gabby Padilla), visiting her mother, Anita (Tanya Gomez), for Undas.


The classic film “Insiang” by the late National Artist Lino Brocka was also screened, allowing the audience to witness its raw, powerful portrait of urban struggle, betrayal, and resilience.


Filmmakers Ramos and Valenzuela also participated in a talkback session moderated by Sanchez.


Participants also learned about the many opportunities available in the industry. Dela Cruz presented the programs of the FDCP Academic Film Society, while FDCP Project Development Assistant Lemor Sobrevega covered the Student Film Assistance Program and Sine Kabataan.


Sanchez also shed light on different visual devices in storytelling for films.


The program was organized by Monika Labaupa, Director and Planning Officer III of the PPC Center for Lifelong Learning, with PPC School of Creativity and Design led by Gozum, PPC Film Society co-adviser Vanessa Millamor Baldueza, and the PPC Film Society, led by president Jannah Grace T. Umali.


Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas Wazzup Pilipinas and the Umalohokans. Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas celebrating 10th year of online presence
 
Copyright © 2013 Wazzup Pilipinas News and Events
Design by FBTemplates | BTT